From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 22.1.90; desktop-save throws (error "No buffer named ") Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:24:51 +0100 Message-ID: References: <92ve4aefit.fsf@nospam.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204295110 2080 80.91.229.12 (29 Feb 2008 14:25:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:25:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Martin Fischer" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 29 15:25:35 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JV6B5-0001J0-2e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:25:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JV6AY-0001hn-Iz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:25:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JV6AT-0001fm-OI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:24:57 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JV6AS-0001e6-5C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:24:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JV6AR-0001dr-Pq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:24:55 -0500 Original-Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.183]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JV6AR-00028N-Jh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:24:55 -0500 Original-Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k34so5335072wah.10 for ; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:24:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=7D25kZerr/10z6PhbtFodfQZPTJPpZgMLvk/IW9duYQ=; b=rBH7Ow4JJySAFW1kYGrXvhH3ici2m3dlUMYwDjaSXc2U98YKjfRV8aa/CW2nRjcl9GAxXproJt6P1KQw/0IRLVeE2OpdaT11FAKc8/xDLXQn9AaKU2Dm2EmS9HTBB/exQ7NoKCfWw8fEv4qLBUcxRz2YuWS1XCGz5c9Y7SdSDRM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=QZMeZ45x/HTbJJObfKH0IykFpT8UebNAbeXQFSINeR/k4eXc7rdvzFLi3iPCokN3ck3Qq9EaSAtbIdxeqghJMUe5HaQvP6cO75sk0NdWA+PmgCAdEqWUKJmZuoXQCeDPlIyKeeEI1oR1Vmy2IU6R50rhT2NzVjKD3GqZgJUB8io= Original-Received: by 10.114.130.1 with SMTP id c1mr11461431wad.52.1204295091626; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:24:51 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.115.72.13 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:24:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:90880 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:21355 Archived-At: On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Martin Fischer wrote: > GNU Emacs 22.1.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2007-08-18 on TPAD. > > I got it from > > http://ntemacs.sourceforge.net/ Well, yes. This is an unofficial build of Emacs, apparently checked out from the CVS before I fixed the bug in your original report. It's no wonder that it fails... If you want a more up-to-date binary, perhaps you can write to the maintainer of that port, or try at http://ourcomments.org/Emacs/EmacsW32.html Juanma