From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs pretest 22.1.91 Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 02:23:29 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87ejb8vl0i.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <47C17D74.9050204@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203989036 8903 80.91.229.12 (26 Feb 2008 01:23:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:23:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Jason Rumney , Emacs Devel To: "Takashi Hiromatsu" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 26 02:24:20 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JToYD-0006Oi-4S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 02:24:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JToXh-0002jH-96 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:23:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JToXd-0002gw-AD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:23:33 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JToXb-0002e1-Ov for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:23:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JToXb-0002dq-Ka for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:23:31 -0500 Original-Received: from el-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.162.176]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JToXb-0008U4-C0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:23:31 -0500 Original-Received: by el-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m34so1759793ele.10 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:23:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=/GrDDUjPObbBnHgeSr7jiQ6uc2to9XWsKTZ6lQ+vFKg=; b=tcxowGzjcuWbk89gZB5lH41a6LZvQQKJ+C6XkRX+KFgMLOFdvkiEyWSGwobtanvmTAdS23dOWvPbUGj4zAjmlozBaxf1zKaxqrioLtGKAXv4mA1eF1RkmqTFqx5SI5I7Fi86PwV/qcmalcbBWK8Rs7mTLXFuJX7TmA/ucG3StUI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=V4IjdrvfxO4EKsSJfqUAsL5HQBQCDAmdOQ9oSeRW61FJfe4GtVZt2GP/gRfEy9y96QNaNRld6Pw+pPQc5V7lS4AHWqaR3b0hSzoSKKJoxkqXDg3AWbWJw5U4TA6Qh58aPjlCOZSPhyMMpyKlJLtYwdVPFe2CGtaSoWXDBbfAN0A= Original-Received: by 10.114.176.1 with SMTP id y1mr4567702wae.86.1203989010205; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:23:30 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.115.72.13 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:23:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:90452 Archived-At: On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Takashi Hiromatsu wrote: > No, I compiled http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/pretest/emacs-22.1.91.tar.gz > with some patches. That's quite weird. I add this to my .emacs: (let ((xpm (assq 'xpm image-library-alist))) (setcdr xpm (cons "my-xpm.dll" (cdr xpm)))) and run the current EMACS_22_BASE branch code and my-xpm.dll gets loaded instead of libxpm.dll (which is also available in the same directory). So it works for me, with the 22.2 code [the same test fails with the trunk]. Which patches are those? Juanma