From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: image scaling Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:23:41 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87odaam9oy.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <8563wiaskc.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87lk5dr3kf.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203675842 13818 80.91.229.12 (22 Feb 2008 10:24:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:24:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel To: "Chong Yidong" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 22 11:24:24 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JSV4p-00040i-IL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:24:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JSV4K-0008Tf-5u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 05:23:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JSV4E-0008T7-R0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 05:23:46 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JSV4C-0008Su-Lr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 05:23:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JSV4C-0008Sr-E6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 05:23:44 -0500 Original-Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.231]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JSV4C-0006t2-3J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 05:23:44 -0500 Original-Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s7so359912wxc.24 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 02:23:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=bU2DfgwM27m/k4Ji9up+VpTUmkSwtGZHqXZs3B2TSGU=; b=AuCRvqUoTlNiYIYH+nJff19B+jE4sGOHKyUCVUQOIYlpkBdTN1sji356ODZa7F155qpEjZqcKjCNg6ImwHZ6SF+XG0J/hWjs7jthShfMxPh/y3WXsMjjGt8nsdEpWSdsM8u5hsWgHrbqVoa4UoRZUIELv3F0B/cHrIqGUqJ4joc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qVn/IWyfl1lEMD2qWzr7kx1PCTYt1w3fGX1ldOq9aRfZIy97ddpaDcFenY72zTc2eiOjsCWkBFkLWXtqAkwo52TOgoYFs1L/ZB0FQ5k/PtNtFjR7kYdgoyPyjlCf1i602UWOzvAkVdYrP02DhAiDRdLRyrVAVsN4abVBodcLGrA= Original-Received: by 10.115.95.1 with SMTP id x1mr1087677wal.94.1203675822028; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 02:23:42 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.115.72.13 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 02:23:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87lk5dr3kf.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:89951 Archived-At: On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 5:57 AM, Chong Yidong wrote: > for example, the `image-type-available-p' > function checks if a particular image format can be displayed. But it > would be a mess if we force users (Lisp coders) to perform a similar > test before performing things like image rescaling Why would Emacs do rescaling of images that can not be displayed in the running instance of Emacs? Juanma