From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Using windows keys for Emacs META on w32 Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:06:13 +0100 Message-ID: References: <477FED30.10201@gmail.com> <479767E2.70909@gnu.org> <47976D34.4090603@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1201122425 10379 80.91.229.12 (23 Jan 2008 21:07:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:07:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel , Jason Rumney To: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 23 22:07:25 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JHmoD-0002KZ-Bc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:06:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JHmnn-0002LQ-FN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:06:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JHmni-0002HT-C5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:06:26 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JHmng-0002Dw-Cp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:06:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JHmng-0002Dp-9F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:06:24 -0500 Original-Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.180]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JHmne-0008SJ-Ci for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:06:24 -0500 Original-Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k34so5253330wah.10 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:06:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=yjHBrh16b0w2yWmwCgFF6OYU6mdcg5jOkzcmnrXlMaw=; b=AHx7L1AuYq8A2SmeO8wo6Zf5YdXKgOc4oZmCz11ydVqvnk3pWCo/V7tdJa2yWaOXaqYY7o5rSFIbde3OML9dHBcGc8ZMI/gvMoW87ObYcHh869XeijH6Oo/wKzeSglQ4nhmx9NN1h6Rnuqozr0by33EJP0Iq3i9R+GaaLVrTuwI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oR8RosL6LnnkqYhHJehQFoxWtRRQSrS3W+jAGURsrdm/G/kE4Vv9be+anD0mbXArVDYaBJ3g8cN8b/k5C79Nckrsu63aAs+52pMIdHsZfn9LtQ9kD4hjMpkcUyb3+pEyc7p6Yxsou6ZAtigoVOczkuNvUgV9/I87vgsTOv/yst4= Original-Received: by 10.114.92.2 with SMTP id p2mr8938476wab.90.1201122373786; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:06:13 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.115.72.13 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:06:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <47976D34.4090603@gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:87392 Archived-At: On Jan 23, 2008 5:37 PM, Lennart Borgman (gmail) wrote: > I will try to. In fact there was a bug in the patch I sent, but since no > one has said something about it I guess no one has tested it. I was planning to do it, but I agree that fixing the "rough state" is a good idea. I must say, though, that it seems too complicate a patch for such a small benefit. Or I don't understand what you're trying to do (that's another distinct possibility :) Juanma