From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: frame-local variables weirdness Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 11:48:53 +0100 Message-ID: References: <858x65lh4m.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87abps9epx.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1194346194 25052 80.91.229.12 (6 Nov 2007 10:49:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 10:49:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stefan Monnier" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 06 11:49:57 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IpM0G-0005R7-4M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 11:49:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IpLzz-0004AQ-Q2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 05:49:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IpLzv-0004A9-Cw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 05:49:31 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IpLzp-00048m-KH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 05:49:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IpLzp-00048i-HM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 05:49:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IpLzn-0002pI-Td for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 05:49:25 -0500 Original-Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.176]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IpLzY-0001BW-D1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 05:49:08 -0500 Original-Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k34so2412900wah for ; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 02:48:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=GLHu6TSrXpRNSUu260gwpLEEEVP9coIHnrIXdO4paRw=; b=KQjGOWiLTXQCiX9as/ga500WeXVfzoC5gJyR58oBJIDp965EH05pJ31T/ccKp1YrdYa2sqSTitybpDA5XNIA+pKxQEjxHr70u+pQ3mOCarGCE6kSLJH1ix8pq2feUg1L1suvMYUkNvA0A/TrLaD4bcFelGPlualkQ4hLVemiNHM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NB3t39OiNi7ytPc6lmAOEMxXP1hSFVGp+XPSWxdR09OaOdImLFO/P4W+Cq9baCRZS4XP4ZvY/No3MhwDu49eXbMIgbeklR3L/5Wqdh/sW8ecfkPwn2k5KpHu8tox9zuvmY3ZLfTOF1sUEDP8B7LJQL0TscsWA3l4oPVpiM459iQ= Original-Received: by 10.114.160.1 with SMTP id i1mr6288201wae.1194346133880; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 02:48:53 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.114.168.11 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Nov 2007 02:48:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by mx20.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:82648 Archived-At: On 11/6/07, Stefan Monnier wrote: > The status is that it has been deemed a non-bug Yes, for some definition of non-bug. I agree, though, that we shouldn't fix it. > and frame-local variables > have been declared obsolete (on the 22 branch). Which reminds me: wouldn't stil be useful your patch that forbade making a buffer-local variable frame-local (and the other way around)? Juanma