From: "Juanma Barranquero" <lekktu@gmail.com>
To: herring@lanl.gov
Cc: Emacs Devel <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:07:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7ccd24b0710101007w4823378blf3a264013a6f4258@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55463.128.165.123.18.1192035787.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov>
On 10/10/07, Davis Herring <herring@lanl.gov> wrote:
> Perhaps, instead of
> defining a return value for the hook, we should always do the heuristics
> and have the FEATURE-unload-hook do only extra things, because I can't see
> how the heuristics would do too much. Moreover, the hook may modify
> `unload-hook-features-list', even to nil, if it really needs to override
> the heuristics.
Yes, that's what I've been proposing. It should have to be a new hook
for compatibility, I think.
> Of course, a new doc string that describes the final behavior should be
> written, but there's no point in writing two new ones. (The doc should
> probably list what the function does more explicitly, so that package
> authors can see whether they need to write a hook.)
Agreed.
Juanma
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-10 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-04 18:03 unload-feature questions and thoughts Juanma Barranquero
2007-02-04 18:32 ` David Kastrup
2007-02-04 19:07 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-02-04 19:14 ` David Kastrup
2007-02-05 0:10 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-02-05 7:21 ` David Kastrup
2007-02-05 9:21 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-02-05 9:32 ` David Kastrup
2007-02-05 11:08 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-02-05 11:16 ` David Kastrup
2007-02-05 11:40 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-02-06 0:16 ` Richard Stallman
2007-10-10 11:04 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-10-10 14:52 ` Davis Herring
2007-10-10 16:08 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-10-10 17:03 ` Davis Herring
2007-10-10 17:07 ` Juanma Barranquero [this message]
2007-10-10 17:56 ` Davis Herring
2007-10-11 5:20 ` Richard Stallman
2007-10-11 6:39 ` David Kastrup
2007-10-11 15:16 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-10-12 15:59 ` Richard Stallman
2007-10-12 17:01 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-10-13 6:41 ` Richard Stallman
2007-10-13 10:03 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-10-14 16:28 ` Richard Stallman
2007-10-14 22:34 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-10-15 16:03 ` Richard Stallman
2007-10-15 16:22 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-10-16 4:10 ` Richard Stallman
2007-10-16 8:15 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-10-17 5:02 ` Richard Stallman
2007-10-17 23:39 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-10-23 19:27 ` Davis Herring
2007-10-24 8:32 ` Richard Stallman
2007-10-11 16:41 ` Davis Herring
2007-10-12 2:46 ` Richard Stallman
2007-10-25 21:24 ` David Kastrup
2007-10-28 13:51 ` Richard Stallman
2007-10-10 21:03 ` Richard Stallman
2007-10-10 21:42 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-02-05 19:10 ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-05 23:27 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-02-06 17:09 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f7ccd24b0710101007w4823378blf3a264013a6f4258@mail.gmail.com \
--to=lekktu@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=herring@lanl.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.