From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `*' interactive spec in some text-killing functions Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 11:09:27 +0200 Message-ID: References: <85fy4d56u8.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85bqf0649m.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <86ps3gy02e.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <86lke4xz7z.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <86d4zgxxet.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1183021794 14442 80.91.229.12 (28 Jun 2007 09:09:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 09:09:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: "David Kastrup" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 28 11:09:49 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I3q0V-0007R5-JD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 11:09:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I3q0U-0005Jp-AN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 05:09:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I3q0K-0005G8-Rs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 05:09:32 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I3q0H-00057j-25 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 05:09:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I3q0G-00057O-RK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 05:09:28 -0400 Original-Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.227]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I3q0G-0002i8-Di for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 05:09:28 -0400 Original-Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s7so115491wxc for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 02:09:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oJWvqpSyFMtD4DhjS28+Q0Mw8wPJHMzrUeXAevX2y5eCv8t1xsuYxtsuq99xMNsd/83qzMQhU6FmW26HF0txVAfMadS73iyi9yoPV/Qg7uyvj+hgBfgpKsknhloi7VQBSb6YW+lhxIAe1wLoikr/bwg388qw3rCE/MJF//QwlF4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=CrhpuPH0WkV85r+34l38oHkhosqo9EGl+kVttukgpe79IxAzMSqPQHsiSmYaTh2vl+XtCF895och/2vQfrj7a2FDORlBvL6xqiVzNk0G0sJ5/bolr5RRr4djQnmrK5e3K4BAcae5VbWydg/yA1iVFxX6u7wvt1l+HQhIrAP3How= Original-Received: by 10.90.91.14 with SMTP id o14mr1389523agb.1183021767959; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 02:09:27 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.90.87.8 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 02:09:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86d4zgxxet.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:73980 Archived-At: On 6/28/07, David Kastrup wrote: > A warning is only useful if there are _consequences_ for not heeding > the warning. But there _aren't_ in this case. I'm not sure what are the consequences of doing PgUp ten times in a row, other than wasted time and finger wear. You remind me of a boss who once tried to convince me that his way to do mental calculations was more efficient for me, even when I tried it and said him it was not the case. Juanma