From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A wish, a plea Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 16:22:58 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1182694995 15811 80.91.229.12 (24 Jun 2007 14:23:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 14:23:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 24 16:23:13 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I2SzY-0004kb-UV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 16:23:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I2SzY-0000fF-9m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 10:23:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I2SzV-0000ev-SO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 10:23:01 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I2SzT-0000ei-Gz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 10:23:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I2SzT-0000ef-BX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 10:22:59 -0400 Original-Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.226]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I2SzT-0001Ap-2j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 10:22:59 -0400 Original-Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h26so1273787wxd for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 07:22:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UwfkeRjRLdWYIqNw01ETnVfEHxuwlpty8GWG/H5z9wY8DmfBRTx9VACfP2CgGmY/RCWl2sWJMpcx5+wJlo/8K7GuOI//uNq+CDfWIRu1bC3sKdi9jZkvwr5rYhpNMCbw7tFsaQA/DIQbwiOO17cOYos/EtUmCzTZ+k20xCqHigo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=H5kpI8ulqOOt7riApfR4rBfCfR1D3BHCUbwhMdxfogSSycT1Ihmw7SgPWWD0XR4AXbQc30NUnhQPufEWoiX5Fno6dRvfQDuUthoFhef9M/GxgJagW0gm/5YU1O9b/Gd4mJNPMB2Vz74NCQbOfq7iEjrXdUXfFN4uKSrRFp1PTto= Original-Received: by 10.90.34.3 with SMTP id h3mr3606395agh.1182694978604; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 07:22:58 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.90.87.8 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 07:22:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:73749 Archived-At: On 6/24/07, Drew Adams wrote: > No, of course my proposal is not better _because_ I like it. I gave reasons why it is better. #2 is the summary, not the argument. So it's not better. You just have arguments that make *you* think that it is better. So in discussing your contributions to this thread with David, it does not add information that you said that this fix is better. We're likely to suppose you think so of your own proposals. > Whether or not #2 refers to the best proposal of its kind, and > whether or not Juanma likes it, are irrelevant to pointing out > that the proposal was relevant to the discussion. I don't think you know anything about what I like or not about your proposal. > Why? Because proposals are countable. Then David was right. Your proposals are not countable. Juanma