From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Don't concat directories to file names Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 09:55:39 +0200 Message-ID: References: <86r6o91zmd.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <87k5ty66nq.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <86wsxxvief.fsf@ketchup.de.uu.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1182499076 2807 80.91.229.12 (22 Jun 2007 07:57:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 07:57:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 22 09:57:54 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I1e1f-0007Bb-EM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 09:57:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I1e1Z-0005bB-27 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 03:57:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I1e1V-0005aG-LM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 03:57:41 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I1e1S-0005Zf-9F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 03:57:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I1e1S-0005Zc-3w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 03:57:38 -0400 Original-Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.229]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I1e1P-0001Lg-6J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 03:57:37 -0400 Original-Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h26so783978wxd for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 00:55:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Pg3artTUCgeID+GFFMKgfC6Cicnuo57NdH4F/m/rbvYcChUG/fNM/+ov6aP/zP1jrZ6pSGnRot5GZtFzfSWjAx3jqgtb47BocQYcCee1sZPJ/jkyg/yfC1qNst4KNzgKYUQ1UVQfCmhU9jZpqwUn9cVYGWCmVE5uOcO0Zq+ka9Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jmGuKzNIjQldI4l2IBCrrbqX9kNS0Ce/sLAl9Wfo2ZbhcTAerlWLbtFLsycbhkUiqoKM6tG9bn5FKII0OM7g4q/dtBG8Nyi8wt4KO+6fScAki/xlfhovghn3IyJECZjk6at9Za4F0vwwbQMCI4hPbwSKbDB+FMY0x+CmwsqjwAE= Original-Received: by 10.90.68.15 with SMTP id q15mr2405955aga.1182498939460; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 00:55:39 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.90.87.8 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 00:55:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:73588 Archived-At: On 6/22/07, Richard Stallman wrote: > Ok, I will agree to `user-data-directory'. Great, thanks. > Exactly -- the only thing they have in common is having a special > relationship to Emacs. My point was that saying that they have a special relationship with Emacs is equally generic. > In that case, both `locate-user-XYZ-directory' and `find-user-XYZ-directory' > are bad names for it. Yes. I was suggesting something with -file. > I suggest the name `locale-emacs-data-file'. Going with the `user-data-directory' theme, I think it's better `locate-user-data-file'. Juanma