From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: feature request: indicator of minibuffer-recursion depth Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 02:24:25 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87hcp95lnf.fsf@kfs-lx.testafd.dk> <87sl8t4208.fsf@jurta.org> <87odjgyftq.fsf@jurta.org> <87r6ocss74.fsf@jurta.org> <871wgcrctl.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1181953474 12860 80.91.229.12 (16 Jun 2007 00:24:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 00:24:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, storm@cua.dk, miles@gnu.org To: "Juri Linkov" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 16 02:24:32 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HzM5f-0005oe-Cp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 02:24:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HzM5e-0000O9-OH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:24:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HzM5c-0000Nw-Ag for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:24:28 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HzM5a-0000N7-S7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:24:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HzM5a-0000N3-Kt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:24:26 -0400 Original-Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.226]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HzM5a-00020U-30 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:24:26 -0400 Original-Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h26so1157701wxd for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:24:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=EmbopQoXGu7TcbuLBYsWvYlERReRm9fTC5AXWo7edERuJOc6viYRQjvThYyOmqJYNyFP6QogYkUyMht8fetnp7ENjQQZkXR/zHW4CfHUCDJdv/f37czt81armuX3hGllnOCFHVi5kh8lZCy3rlpZzkzEKlCm3hzTlHxIhTzWRUc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ExOUdVYMuQEWzAZc9Q5IMIFW6jfReAiKuakozdWga7qO2vjovGRYzGtsylb+QPtGKleJg6Mt3f82jdVkuvMp+28p96W0nsoepUhzZza+yzzVJaqCR49U+NDU/GErigtaF3DqHrMWgfr6bwD5GeatPePFGE79fFZTqFzgikx31Rg= Original-Received: by 10.90.50.1 with SMTP id x1mr3210508agx.1181953465572; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:24:25 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.90.87.8 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:24:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <871wgcrctl.fsf@jurta.org> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:73032 Archived-At: On 6/16/07, Juri Linkov wrote: > I like such a configurability of the C version when it means: don't use > the C version and start hacking `minibuffer-setup-hook' in Lisp. And I like what you define as configurability of the elisp version, which is: "throw the only significant, non-trivial function of the module and redefine it in your .emacs". > This is very bad. This means that you have no control on what it does > with the minibuffer, and can't fix its bad effects. Yeah, is quite difficult just to deactivate it. Whatever. Juanma