From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: EmacsW32 invocation options Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 02:09:48 +0200 Message-ID: References: <59osrdF2m97hgU1@mid.individual.net> <46383B57.6050508@gmail.com> <4638EE03.8000602@gmail.com> <858xc60y22.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85bqh1y11a.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1178237418 17999 80.91.229.12 (4 May 2007 00:10:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 00:10:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: "David Kastrup" Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 04 02:10:17 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HjlNF-0002hL-N0 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 May 2007 02:10:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HjlTp-0005Sa-35 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 May 2007 20:17:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HjlTU-0005HF-R9 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 May 2007 20:16:41 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HjlTS-0005Ad-DM for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 May 2007 20:16:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HjlTS-00058h-1Q for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 May 2007 20:16:38 -0400 Original-Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.230]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HjlMr-0000Pb-Ar for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 May 2007 20:09:49 -0400 Original-Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s17so638576wxc for ; Thu, 03 May 2007 17:09:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uO8dJp+DS6FNPMB1Ns5hrm18hKfCDFnImEepZ29BlBxk3EcdJxiytqyTNQqIAvsJSoJ4/15rD9BmpdO3uUcmMnPSuXFqPpgtB4S38oB59lYgeK06d4XdCskhopKcB5RmMY0guPz8u8bBqcAp8LbL6Li5NDSQNLJTvbxWrp1oGeo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=KYPpt6AWQ4pwJxCXI7j8sw8LDv7q3b1LJh21KwFbZvK4z1JT7gy5w04A5JirhwKgdb/sOI0a9VfVZ2nSz/cbd7pu5WkIG06m8oGSCCkr6TYQvgU+YIp31s9PjYT15x4qHQUc8dFqNW1NpuGwYi15w1yfnVCnvDvNkO7mtndXKzU= Original-Received: by 10.90.66.9 with SMTP id o9mr2714054aga.1178237388803; Thu, 03 May 2007 17:09:48 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.90.103.8 with HTTP; Thu, 3 May 2007 17:09:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <85bqh1y11a.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:43628 Archived-At: On 5/4/07, David Kastrup wrote: > Like the active users of Emacs 18 will fully agree with you about your > sentiments concerning the Emacs/XEmacs fork. That's a bit of a cheat. I'm sure there are active users of Emacs who were once users of Emacs 18. The Emacs/XEmacs fork is not some barely half-remembered thing of the past. Juanma