From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: EmacsW32 invocation options Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 15:26:24 +0200 Message-ID: References: <59osrdF2m97hgU1@mid.individual.net> <4637A396.9000300@gmail.com> <87zm4mw7hj.fsf@gmail.com> <878xc6uois.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1178198808 31694 80.91.229.12 (3 May 2007 13:26:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 13:26:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Hadron Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 03 15:26:46 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HjbKV-0008Qh-1J for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 May 2007 15:26:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HjbR1-0007LI-9C for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 May 2007 09:33:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HjbQl-0007Hz-9I for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 May 2007 09:33:11 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HjbQj-0007H8-Uz for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 May 2007 09:33:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HjbQj-0007H5-Qb for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 May 2007 09:33:09 -0400 Original-Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.225]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HjbKC-0001Ik-Qv for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 May 2007 09:26:24 -0400 Original-Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s17so455792wxc for ; Thu, 03 May 2007 06:26:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dEBIyGuJFOvraazd85RMMLCviMgigR25PkxoEmRYqgwLfqHNvsJhwNsyXeYeQbtgPEs2ewpqT55APHQP+xg3nXDBZU+j7thg4qTdhmeQMqqvDoitPPSWTKRMqjJXcGnSVag8b4OQ8yxsQ2q/QIfxJ859uADPOHJsm7Ox81xQFiQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lt0uTet+4V+bJl5Vw1aWmzlw2Dkd5+rvAMs/S28C3ClLK6HcprJ3EWgqeMYXb0BcxwA2R6+Xd+ak1atDr4tvjXJNEP8cAcT1YzxNXuJLe+ytml90W37gc+3ZZIndAPSAKYnoBDCyKrPN9E/LUiPWpsqV17fVIZ9jShFoMNfMbfM= Original-Received: by 10.90.90.3 with SMTP id n3mr1705334agb.1178198784473; Thu, 03 May 2007 06:26:24 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.90.87.8 with HTTP; Thu, 3 May 2007 06:26:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <878xc6uois.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:43592 Archived-At: On 5/3/07, Hadron wrote: > I have often found in the development world that sometimes "additional > thought" is a euphemism for "not today, not tomorrow, maybe in a few > years when I have nothing better to do". There are times when it can > benefit a development to let the young guns go blazing and see what > happens. Sometimes :-; Yeah, well, I don't think that was the case right now. > And one fairly easy to answer - yes. I was suggesting that there are other good questions. > But note the important bit - "from > those who actually use it". Irrelevant, I think. Everybody involved in the emacsclient discussion were also emacsclient users. Juanma