From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: EmacsW32 invocation options Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 13:02:28 +0200 Message-ID: References: <59osrdF2m97hgU1@mid.individual.net> <4637A396.9000300@gmail.com> <87zm4mw7hj.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1178190171 31861 80.91.229.12 (3 May 2007 11:02:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 11:02:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Hadron Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 03 13:02:50 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HjZ5F-0001tm-4R for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 May 2007 13:02:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HjZBk-0003R2-J0 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 May 2007 07:09:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HjZBT-0003Ne-5h for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 May 2007 07:09:15 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HjZBR-0003Ks-N8 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 May 2007 07:09:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HjZBR-0003KV-GF for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 May 2007 07:09:13 -0400 Original-Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.234]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HjZ4v-0000Gz-3c for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 May 2007 07:02:29 -0400 Original-Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s17so416012wxc for ; Thu, 03 May 2007 04:02:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PiORYlHns8RUJQl7unqZsY5H4nHOxqT2X/CVpXkN1OcAd0v2RdIoi38pneemQ0IuWozo/W8McEFOgHwHLvFn3OwPXkuNu4U+oN1s38W7DIVlj3GloJT0OQo+I2E9cjzvivYyQbFfnuZA6OtJHBPGZ9xfV8WcFZk31c0V8/wqO2A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IlaOuSit/qevka8XH6cbHzE7W/xbl9m6gz0pKGbnCzMbb2XbbvyT6ynCzVB3Vj0OccMo1nBxSGjae0QOc2hNyZzR7Z1I4Op61zP0EFYncFN8puUgxZNZJ+tLWN92Mum3iR6RA9gm1yaIxCaEWrlL2iQrK976p7ssNpSwVOCdp1g= Original-Received: by 10.90.119.15 with SMTP id r15mr1499105agc.1178190148785; Thu, 03 May 2007 04:02:28 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.90.87.8 with HTTP; Thu, 3 May 2007 04:02:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87zm4mw7hj.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:43589 Archived-At: On 5/3/07, Hadron wrote: > In SW there are always those who prefer not to do rather than do because > then there is no risk of the apple cart being upset. This attitude can > pay dividends in the long run. "Half assed" solutions to "partial > problems" often come and bite one in the ass at a later date. I suspect > people are worried that W32Emacs might be just such a venture. And in this case, is not that some people (me included) preferred "not to do". More like "not now, because it could benefit from some additional thought". > So, I for one am grateful for Lennart's work on this issue > anyway. Is it perfect? No way. Is it better than went before? > Yes. Of course. > Is > Lennart open to suggestions for improvement from the people who actually > use it? That's a good question. Juanma