From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: EmacsW32 invocation options Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 00:15:28 +0200 Message-ID: References: <59osrdF2m97hgU1@mid.individual.net> <4637A396.9000300@gmail.com> <87vefb47l5.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1178144147 9286 80.91.229.12 (2 May 2007 22:15:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 22:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Hadron Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 03 00:15:46 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HjN6v-0001ry-UI for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 May 2007 00:15:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HjNDN-0006rv-Ns for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 18:22:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HjND9-0006pY-GX for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 18:22:11 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HjND7-0006kh-TI for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 18:22:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HjND7-0006kG-Kv for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 18:22:09 -0400 Original-Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.235]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HjN6e-0001cN-W6 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 18:15:29 -0400 Original-Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s17so282182wxc for ; Wed, 02 May 2007 15:15:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=mt6vq9Ih7xhsUqzQyVwGpYNtAErzejBOVShCJgIPszmpgUyXxl6kWVaZe9yYm2s9rgi6cBOKDE4nbyfSsDi5gUq5yQJjMZhyh0SyHs9K7/qQRBO6ulc9P+/GfylrSyZs91fOa51pLDgalZsw5nwckjdoAMhpzDv/vp8JWeD0B3s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jbOXDqciBpHfs4lhGuoPO40PmmURjVlNF6yoB6CoFBAtIgd5f0eKmneHwipaN4bAhmtSCPJxM/tAHEiYtK5whMnFGSw1y5x3f8dtaEm0NIOJj2vomqsz1U7zaCUaY111omJrNyL5gRSYa7s8AfU7Pt9O5iuKzSpaQqMh12IH4qk= Original-Received: by 10.90.51.17 with SMTP id y17mr1243397agy.1178144128559; Wed, 02 May 2007 15:15:28 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.90.87.8 with HTTP; Wed, 2 May 2007 15:15:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87vefb47l5.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:43551 Archived-At: On 5/2/07, Hadron wrote: > I don't see that as true at all. If you run emacsclient you obviously do > it with the intention of connecting to emacs-server. Yes. But there's no single "right" way to run the Emacs server. There has to be a way for emacsclient to detect that the Emacs server is not running, start it, pass it the info to start the server (if you want a non-default server setup), wait till Emacs *and* the server are operative, and then pass it the original arguments. That's a lot of details, both of implementation and design. Lennart and I disagree about the right way to do both. But design worries me more; that and divergence from the Emacs interface in other OSes. Juanma