From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: EmacsW32 invocation options Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 17:37:32 +0200 Message-ID: References: <59osrdF2m97hgU1@mid.individual.net> <4637A396.9000300@gmail.com> <46383B57.6050508@gmail.com> <463891EE.60804@gmail.com> <4638A23F.9060504@gmail.com> <4638AAD6.8070905@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1178120272 2447 80.91.229.12 (2 May 2007 15:37:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 15:37:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 02 17:37:48 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HjGtn-0002gQ-Ry for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 17:37:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HjH0D-0003qk-Kp for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 11:44:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HjH00-0003qV-RY for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 11:44:12 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HjGzz-0003qJ-DS for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 11:44:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HjGzz-0003qG-7N for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 11:44:11 -0400 Original-Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.228]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HjGtY-00028Y-Gg for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 11:37:32 -0400 Original-Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s17so158923wxc for ; Wed, 02 May 2007 08:37:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tR7xaVizDWv+jAmBZ4J5E5bp6G92c6LhxmCrZd8tenS66qhcZ7JVuDUF9BL7zjkB0ATDkLxsqpSHEPSlwyqWO+OAvUIbzVH6Ol+60avL7VGxEQOV7Ytzjwti7QxhhwVB2xng/SHi+h+cQ6JyBmMS9uknOI/eYxBBPkUcnH6Yg4M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=elUhtV6fA5Y2ON6zsMRRev2SvntFNa6t0fnPaL3p9St1xlOvS6qC4WqYYQQl8dumBE36qQjIBNaA4qZcQhkhU77KZktECJ4pV+/qDGq+Du6W2wpQeONmTJrUe59IkdOrVh9NkVk00ShBKWX4J+1YrtmpgNRnU9uabAfGr7wIs5w= Original-Received: by 10.90.101.19 with SMTP id y19mr588874agb.1178120252096; Wed, 02 May 2007 08:37:32 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.90.87.8 with HTTP; Wed, 2 May 2007 08:37:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4638AAD6.8070905@gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:43511 Archived-At: On 5/2/07, Lennart Borgman (gmail) wrote: > It is more that the feedback at that time had to be on a more detailed > level to be meaningful, at least for me. I don't know whether you're joking. I was simplifying. There was detailed criticism as well as lighter one. > What I meant was that I perhaps could have added > something to your view if you had tried to be more concrete at that > time. (I am not sure I remember the details any more.) It could have added something to your view if you had tried to accept that some of us thought there was no time to do a proper design (much smaller features fell off the wayside because of the "freeze"). You didn't seem to keen on waiting. > That is ok, but it is not my responsibility. No, but you *are* responsible of quite aggressively promoting a distribution that takes pride in doing some things different from the standard one (all these things that you affirm that "do not work" or "are very difficult" in Windows and that you've "fixed" with your ad-hoc solutions). Juanma