From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: EmacsW32 invocation options Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 17:30:52 +0200 Message-ID: References: <59osrdF2m97hgU1@mid.individual.net> <4637A396.9000300@gmail.com> <46383B57.6050508@gmail.com> <87ejlzjv27.fsf@gmail.com> <4638A094.8090708@gmail.com> <4638A852.3010004@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1178119881 926 80.91.229.12 (2 May 2007 15:31:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 15:31:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, Hadron To: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 02 17:31:15 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HjGnQ-0000Hi-Jb for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 17:31:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HjGtq-0005UQ-5A for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 11:37:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HjGtZ-0005Ra-6U for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 11:37:33 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HjGtX-0005Na-Or for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 11:37:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HjGtX-0005NX-Jz for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 11:37:31 -0400 Original-Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.233]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HjGn6-0000vd-Vf for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 11:30:53 -0400 Original-Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s17so156587wxc for ; Wed, 02 May 2007 08:30:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dWvuyLtH/Z8hXOQqA8in0a9/+2BedgqJqfZaRpPwoAvTiRoflsPR5HrXj+u6NGXYF060jOCN57BJ53Mb6Ikk5VcNNjE4U12Z8zc0XH0vo/0BqMSV1J9V4qAfaweEexCUBEUL4Wm7vRdHp5J135eDfHHMI6M/W1EsJNp0uiuH/Wo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=VLbtb2n5rjrh7EDuWQxuomBMNePQNnrQ46Cr5O55Q7S8avQLodx46bPFyd3/pwRbP46hjfvaSj1SHanfRgvzj3Ma4z1SfcC7D0yTN6MT43r6be7h/aQ7xtcMZU+5l1MlOhX2+Om8l2mNvd4PjvS7h/Gj7pn8wXFwltQ4LJnNx3U= Original-Received: by 10.90.99.20 with SMTP id w20mr563887agb.1178119852189; Wed, 02 May 2007 08:30:52 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.90.87.8 with HTTP; Wed, 2 May 2007 08:30:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4638A852.3010004@gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:43510 Archived-At: On 5/2/07, Lennart Borgman (gmail) wrote: > I was concerned about new users. Every difficulty when trying to start > using Emacs is a big thing. No way. Not being able to print from Windows would be big. Having to click on the Emacs icon *once* before using the client is hardly big. IMHO, etc. etc. > And if you are on MS Windows it was very > difficult to get started. I've read you say that more than once, but I'm still unconvinced. > However if you are > talking about user specific elisp code that must be ran I believe it is > possible to extend the solution in my patched Emacs client without > difficulties. Almost everything can be extended, often without difficulties. That does not imply cleanliness of design. Juanma