From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Release schedule Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 10:11:54 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87r6qdlecf.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177229528 26721 80.91.229.12 (22 Apr 2007 08:12:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 08:12:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Eli Zaretskii" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 22 10:12:01 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HfXAv-00009B-BS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 10:12:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HfXGB-00023k-EN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 04:17:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HfXG8-00023f-EE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 04:17:24 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HfXG6-00023T-0j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 04:17:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HfXG5-00023Q-Px for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 04:17:21 -0400 Original-Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.224]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HfXAo-0006cE-Re for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 04:11:55 -0400 Original-Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s17so1439963wxc for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:11:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TeQFe4M0btQUJWWge/Qnv3Ya+i8C2913HkHHhbRiZSTrK5NBevFxuDf9q7qr8++IVceERrZwbUa4GYq7s36+b2uBYl59mZu1b+4bq3lBnTqKim9qyL24kZrGX8eSaMaahqr5+p1tYitUZ1Sz2w5EauFVwvld7jaF38SBzC6xeQs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=QoSZ8yGl8rNM1H3zvujrXc9iSIi+AV8aqtSoGSmMbFJd39pRdOuOY1p5qocCWKHwQspi+QRsVYzuBd/ZWH7Mks6JpzqFtAvlHZlflC4mNXHZoDIw9G6e4MPdAux5y70qL/kbJy6foKhkBzMvi3HIgzRpua9i+peoRJeY9vqw6cg= Original-Received: by 10.90.83.14 with SMTP id g14mr1314080agb.1177229514197; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:11:54 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.90.87.8 with HTTP; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:11:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69775 Archived-At: On 4/22/07, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > So I think we need another pretest, but if I'm the only one, so be it. You're not the only one. It wouldn't be the first time that apparently trivial changes bite us. Releasing without testing seems a bit reckless, and it's not like a few days more will even be noticeable against our quinquennial-release backdrop. So I'm all for another pretest. Juanma