From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Latest emacs snapshots max CPU on XP Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:48:19 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172692138 30118 80.91.229.12 (28 Feb 2007 19:48:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:48:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: "Chris McMahan" Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 28 20:48:41 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HMUn0-0002Ue-Mh for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:48:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HMUn1-0007gk-JB for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:48:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HMUmn-0007d5-EE for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:48:25 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HMUmm-0007bW-0B for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:48:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HMUml-0007b9-PH for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:48:23 -0500 Original-Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.235]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HMUml-0002oE-El for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:48:23 -0500 Original-Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i3so358697wra for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:48:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=G15Np5d6LoSzMcxhR3UY6SB7xA4FOWBaNHzBnUlW6CDwXe3s3pLuih9FJ1ajh1WkgIH3r1QHlKGEt5mCOvVBlKatIaYG+U707K4i1z25Tsc2NrrMkczFRMsQ8cZ8oOqXO9SsZf8fpW0SzR5Rusy2UducoaFR7hL6PXzIWp16Ylw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TAY785Fq/dPpq3Cacn0Xn/ZlItI5TJPh5bKqp2l3mn6Nqol7lsalGLTcOD58Sx/Y9p92TNbNpXefO0uBuE1Cns7V7SnaA99tIY+aqRTM7OUBuMaRMhsgZG7XLWq6YdgcoqviKP9RZOFpx+FAOLQc/quQ8B2AmOnDHFm7Q6smBMQ= Original-Received: by 10.114.125.2 with SMTP id x2mr111821wac.1172692099735; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:48:19 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.114.234.16 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:48:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:41539 Archived-At: On 2/28/07, Chris McMahan wrote: > I've used pre-compiled XP binaries and compiled my own using MinGW, > and both will suddenly start using up 60-80% of my CPU resources. I've > not been able to correlate any specific activities with this behavior. Could you please try adding (setq jit-lock-stealth-time nil) to your .emacs and report whether it helps? > The pre-compiled version I'm currently using does not have this > problem > - GNU Emacs 22.0.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2006-06-04 on TPAD There's quit a lot of changes between that version and the current pretest. When did you start to notice the problem? Do you load many buffers, particularly many buffers with complex fontification (source code, etc.)? Juanma