From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:56:51 +0100 Message-ID: References: <85tzxazb8r.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87ps7x4clj.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <85irdpweuq.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85649pw652.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85slctupij.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172501840 2197 80.91.229.12 (26 Feb 2007 14:57:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:57:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "David Kastrup" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 26 15:57:14 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HLhHr-0001Lv-19 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:57:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HLhHq-0005In-NR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:57:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HLhHf-0005Gl-Ch for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:56:59 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HLhHd-0005Bu-74 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:56:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HLhHc-0005Bn-VN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:56:56 -0500 Original-Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.243]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HLhHc-0005wx-KO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:56:56 -0500 Original-Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b8so779196ana for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 06:56:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jXFoa8lWTCtqX5eFsb7cbn7dQAqoFtyustzZzwY5sgxBJEyPI/gTXhBFeit2ZivfM8GSbVhdjvcy2YkJxlL81w0eW1GeLML9D/2P485U2TfsyS8n+HF7pkJ7pWHtTflZXrMe2ZAJU1/QO2M45qAKfeZl21D7VVWktdh9x08t3dk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=EW8m7Ml871oxk0Y/Ix/JXmukMIeLHKOZ67C9pwtSZHQ9Hw3vH6AnLphj3jE2oGU7qS3iRWmYMUp2XC54sdM36chqFbhzatxpUYrc9cRgYt6J/vAgAqSm0sKPG6SxRQZQleSukhzC44eo7i5eID+YCZ/PwixIwG+f7P+u281ddzE= Original-Received: by 10.114.94.1 with SMTP id r1mr674469wab.1172501811787; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 06:56:51 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.114.234.16 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 06:56:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <85slctupij.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66854 Archived-At: On 2/26/07, David Kastrup wrote: > Ok, but working with many buffers is not something particularly > forbidden. Of course not. I won't even suggest my use of Emacs is typical at all. Juanma