From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Image mode Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 18:56:52 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87k5yxeg19.fsf@jurta.org> <7dbe73ed0702050647y15d4ed7cu381a869cd2e835f3@mail.gmail.com> <87lkjcttv5.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <45C77904.8080308@gnu.org> <87hcu0l909.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87d54otndk.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1170784726 12240 80.91.229.12 (6 Feb 2007 17:58:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 17:58:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 06 18:58:28 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HEUaJ-0006UQ-Qc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 18:58:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HEUaJ-0002xN-A9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 12:58:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HEUYq-00027s-Dc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 12:56:56 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HEUYo-000264-EP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 12:56:55 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HEUYo-00025r-2Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 12:56:54 -0500 Original-Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.245]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HEUYn-0001c3-Hp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 12:56:53 -0500 Original-Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b8so1209226ana for ; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 09:56:53 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Ma/BBLunWmCFmDNrFpYH3XG3iRT68ZIZuzCY3gJ96cd5D0/ln+WXRhumqBBSubeeOmIbdFD9ATiFQAoEcpXKN2X+2lxKFWdbuVs+fS8TKBHlBTCZyQ5g8DTihvzOxtd8SfGEFbv0dakypqPgnErjaS90rBodNZp+Yc1NdpRmY1k= Original-Received: by 10.114.75.1 with SMTP id x1mr805238waa.1170784612240; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 09:56:52 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.114.234.16 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:56:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66030 Archived-At: On 2/6/07, Richard Stallman wrote: > The vehemence of your statements comes across as an attack What part, the one where I say that it would be better to rethink the image support, or the other, where I defend against accusations of not taking the time to consider options just because I don't agree with them? On a second thought, perhaps you're referring to the message (for once short and to the point, I'd say) in which I answer to my arguments being called strawmen (at least it wasn't a dead horse). /L/e/k/t/u