From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C file recoginzed as image file Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 23:47:08 +0100 Message-ID: References: <45AB9A3C.5030406@gnu.org> <45B0F2CA.9060808@gnu.org> <45B3EAEB.5010707@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1169419649 12601 80.91.229.12 (21 Jan 2007 22:47:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 22:47:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 21 23:47:26 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H8lTA-0008NU-Gg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 23:47:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H8lTA-0007BS-Ay for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 17:47:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H8lSy-0007AO-UO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 17:47:12 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H8lSw-00079A-Nf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 17:47:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H8lSw-00078v-KL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 17:47:10 -0500 Original-Received: from [66.249.92.170] (helo=ug-out-1314.google.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H8lSv-00063l-Sm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 17:47:10 -0500 Original-Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j3so1013287ugf for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 14:47:08 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LZWyTYumP+2HCpGfQF8ETPjTwOufp/hqAVlcayc9B50gAyTExpRemzXY+VxVxEP+zMcE9NSNKE/bPe1DfQNHd/ff9epvDagUCeOIbNFaXQdqTYTdSlg+VFcef2BhzH11naxDgeMoDHhL6liSEtzPRFHIUBsD+VZ3ZrMWNCwfIzE= Original-Received: by 10.67.99.1 with SMTP id b1mr6600590ugm.1169419628759; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 14:47:08 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.67.105.7 with HTTP; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 14:47:08 -0800 (PST) Original-To: "Jason Rumney" In-Reply-To: <45B3EAEB.5010707@gnu.org> Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:65355 Archived-At: On 1/21/07, Jason Rumney wrote: > Can we give a specific reason in the message the user sees when they > first run the command? Or do all disabled commands get the same message? The first three lines of the disabled command are shown in the "this command is disabled" message. That's why I added the NOTE: in my example patch. Reworking the command's docstring would be better, of course. /L/e/k/t/u