From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How about a new pretest? Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 01:46:55 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87wt4pccoo.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <17798.60984.342170.380829@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1166489284 15478 80.91.229.2 (19 Dec 2006 00:48:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 00:48:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 19 01:48:01 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GwT8T-00034B-7D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 01:47:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GwT8S-0006dn-R4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 19:47:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GwT8F-0006dd-7Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 19:46:59 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GwT8D-0006cq-Ry for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 19:46:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GwT8D-0006cl-Hw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 19:46:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [64.233.182.186] (helo=nf-out-0910.google.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GwT8D-0001rK-Ge for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 19:46:57 -0500 Original-Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d4so2123088nfe for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:46:55 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=af5unJR8PK7I57511EZ81UybLV+/Dlc3C5DCAD+QRnK+CAgntf/Aw5y0TL6vc5KEpaAjuVbCDIbEW58yZWscjcufHm9BzKanuhgFy85WDAvWscLgU1BChlh+t8YFfT0BucUDXNxLy+mv/22jE6H2sI5fby43j8PaMQ6BJOsssUc= Original-Received: by 10.82.153.5 with SMTP id a5mr730468bue.1166489215490; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:46:55 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.82.147.2 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:46:55 -0800 (PST) Original-To: "Nick Roberts" In-Reply-To: <17798.60984.342170.380829@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:63943 Archived-At: On 12/18/06, Nick Roberts wrote: > I think each pretest tarball should be a release candidate. Obviously, I don't. My own position is in 100% agreement with Eli's. /L/e/k/t/u