From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Special treatment of `term-setup-hook' Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 16:58:18 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1165507133 20399 80.91.229.10 (7 Dec 2006 15:58:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 15:58:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 07 16:58:52 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GsLdv-0003xf-VK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2006 16:58:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GsLdv-0000le-Hu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2006 10:58:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GsLdk-0000lY-2H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2006 10:58:28 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GsLde-0000iu-Cp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2006 10:58:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GsLde-0000ic-7O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2006 10:58:22 -0500 Original-Received: from [66.249.92.174] (helo=ug-out-1314.google.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GsLde-0002oe-8c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2006 10:58:22 -0500 Original-Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j3so568275ugf for ; Thu, 07 Dec 2006 07:58:20 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=iWN4k4OAREtXr7J39W1O7tfGUkAVxcHs+Q6nlok5Er/ZCDOnYi8+S80NTHOI25Sa5Lu4a1xxKjAjALz0EpDMItkjTGfsQKK8Kc3muznvRdVvmFKKzTn5kyexMAEp9j8O8Ki+S3ujLhBDW2hG84Vn8iO5WVnimX3TclZ5rtPB4wU= Original-Received: by 10.82.167.5 with SMTP id p5mr99853bue.1165507099280; Thu, 07 Dec 2006 07:58:19 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.82.146.7 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Dec 2006 07:58:18 -0800 (PST) Original-To: "Eli Zaretskii" In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:63416 Archived-At: On 12/7/06, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I would. Fair enough. > This is a delicate mechanism, and now is not the time to > change it. OK, but then I would really like someone to answer my original question: How can (and x (run-hooks 'x)) and (run-hooks 'x) be different (other than return value, which isn't used in this case)? > I understand the problem is not fatal No, of course not. /L/e/k/t/u