From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: w32-enable-(caps|num)-lock vs typematic keyboard Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 17:32:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: <456ED43A.8080906@student.lu.se> <456EFD72.9090007@student.lu.se> <456F0425.6030609@student.lu.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1164904504 27644 80.91.229.2 (30 Nov 2006 16:35:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 16:35:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 30 17:35:00 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gpos1-0003dR-Dq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 17:34:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gpos0-0004sG-Ly for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:34:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GpopS-0001Sz-JN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:32:06 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GpopQ-0001PQ-Qh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:32:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GpopQ-0001P5-IR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:32:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [66.249.92.171] (helo=ug-out-1314.google.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GpopQ-0000S8-8o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:32:04 -0500 Original-Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j3so2357084ugf for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 08:32:02 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=aFE0TCfg+YPiQNIn3G/6/pgeMAnyXyT9z/K/M/axUTXkqK48/As9MscLbnhNQtssFtb/zdyq6TW1YJmDVJzdfyhHBKJb+Y4IM2avNdMBDzAGVRKMhYasLNdMaG8tI8WWrg8q1/S2C5bKraJiVxgEGDtClG67dfAku2PfCJ5vkcE= Original-Received: by 10.82.107.15 with SMTP id f15mr852321buc.1164904322375; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 08:32:02 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.82.147.2 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 08:32:02 -0800 (PST) Original-To: "Lennart Borgman" In-Reply-To: <456F0425.6030609@student.lu.se> Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:63144 Archived-At: On 11/30/06, Lennart Borgman wrote: > Or the implementation is a bug. Is the result really guaranteed to be > well defined when you try this witout a hook? Could there not be subtle > differences between different drivers? It's quite evident that could be subtle (or not so subtle) differences, for the simple reason that I'm *already* reporting a bug. But it is not serious and apparently I'm the only one able to reproduce it. Not enough reason to switch to a low-level hook, and even less right at this moment. > No, I have tried both with or without Sticky Keys. I have no keybinding > on , maybe that makes a difference? I don't use Sticky Keys. And I have no binding in . /L/e/k/t/u