From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should we remove pgg-pgp5.el? Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 20:56:59 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1164398292 17942 80.91.229.2 (24 Nov 2006 19:58:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 19:58:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 24 20:58:09 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GnhBW-00043v-4A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 20:58:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GnhBV-0008CR-8k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:58:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GnhAU-0007OA-RZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:57:02 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GnhAS-0007Me-LQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:57:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GnhAS-0007MU-GS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:57:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [64.233.166.176] (helo=py-out-1112.google.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GnhAS-0001jQ-Fa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:57:00 -0500 Original-Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u77so570732pyb for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:56:59 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Qaoljcmnlb4lpO0KgLQ8GMCxX9rYygc/xDCxzjYUWQR3l2xGo0xkYVGpI/FJDLvJF7hdi4CqSkzt8j3y4jMKyBR2b40EJuTLT8l8WINAwemMvIV0cjprp1jk9P0KB/IHM5XuqotxA8165vlVs/Mwnle2lz4eFZZUZBJ6x/DPQaQ= Original-Received: by 10.35.21.9 with SMTP id y9mr6542592pyi.1164398219360; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:56:59 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.35.95.18 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:56:59 -0800 (PST) Original-To: "Stefan Monnier" In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:62726 Archived-At: On 11/24/06, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > AFAICT pgp5 is not Free Software. Should we remove the pgg-pgp5.el file > that handles pgg's support for pgp5? progmodes/sql.el supports Oracle, for example. For what I gather from previous discussions, I think it is acceptable if we're not offering better support for the non-free program than for the free alternatives. Just my opinion, /L/e/k/t/u