From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Pretest Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:19:17 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87slggjtbb.fsf@furball.mit.edu> <455F9024.8080000@student.lu.se> <17759.43936.82301.353794@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <85irhbg6zx.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <17760.11257.78362.216206@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <85wt5reo3b.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <17760.17309.553008.718144@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1163946076 31313 80.91.229.2 (19 Nov 2006 14:21:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 14:21:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 19 15:21:14 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GlnXc-0004CR-3W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:21:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GlnXb-000689-Eo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:21:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GlnXO-00067e-Vc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:20:50 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GlnXN-000665-7i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:20:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GlnXN-00065z-5f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:20:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [64.233.162.193] (helo=nz-out-0102.google.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GlnXN-0002MN-3I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:20:49 -0500 Original-Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id r28so723858nza for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 06:20:48 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tJQmgIJ11Y1QwD134LLkmFKkeSNivByvccvoW7BJtUV+Cv2OSNH4LxUap+cD/Pn8wVDK7NRWSffbQMDGXNRh3cQCwUu1Xn1qwJz4USL+F+FHGrtAuacmt68o4WR3+1oMM2zt8RLjwipiVpoDB17+JvioKdHrPzhNFJ5e6ayEt/E= Original-Received: by 10.64.250.3 with SMTP id x3mr6726901qbh.1163946048265; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 06:20:48 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.35.95.18 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 06:19:17 -0800 (PST) Original-To: "Nick Roberts" In-Reply-To: <17760.17309.553008.718144@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:62469 Archived-At: On 11/19/06, Nick Roberts wrote: > I'm not telling people what to do, or demanding anything. I'm just saying that > I don't it is appropriate to delay things for further improvements to > emacsclient on Windows. If you're going to sum up, at least do it accurately. Well, if you're going to propose something, you should try to be accurate too. Reading the relevant threads (or even reading this one with a bit of attention to details) should suffice. emacsclient's TCP support is working, and there are no issues. Removing it now would be absurd. Lennart is *proposing* changes that would allow emacsclient to automatically start Emacs if it is not running already. Did you read "Windows" in the previous sentence? I bet you didn't, because it *was not* here. What Lennart's trying to do is not Windows-specific. Whether it is too late to include it or not is another matter altogether, but that can be discussed without the need to remove working code. /L/e/k/t/u