From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 20:46:22 +0200 Message-ID: References: <85hde7t8n2.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85hde6rz82.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <20050804104409.GB4396@kenny.sha-bang.local> <85mznyq7ir.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <20050804142546.GD4396@kenny.sha-bang.local> <85oe8dpy1u.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85oe8do87j.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1123183017 18113 80.91.229.2 (4 Aug 2005 19:16:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 19:16:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 04 21:16:56 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E0lBi-0008UJ-Fz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 21:15:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E0lEX-0000al-2m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 15:18:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E0lBD-0005oP-Ge for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 15:14:59 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E0lBB-0005ly-F3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 15:14:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E0l4E-0002qH-37 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 15:07:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [64.233.182.202] (helo=nproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1E0kwN-00017x-MU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 14:59:39 -0400 Original-Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id h2so101619nfe for ; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 11:46:22 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ubO1fcD4ZhARDi41v6lKV3mYzK1GMSf5VhgbWI6yTAvS93j3uVlYlOqfFloOXbfFBQSA5cS8O4rjqZp1Gv1xtBkamDsunXkX6EGLm2XHync0A919kMHNrt2KFZp1euBvj3zpKNivpopAZJBnIu0pgQhsiXzcDmZq3Tof4z4pE2E= Original-Received: by 10.48.249.6 with SMTP id w6mr72216nfh; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 11:46:22 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.48.250.5 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Aug 2005 11:46:22 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: David Kastrup In-Reply-To: <85oe8do87j.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:41503 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:41503 On 8/4/05, David Kastrup wrote: > But in my > reply to Sascha I pointed out to him that his way of applying the term > "a program" to Linux would fit GNU/Linux quite as well. Which did not > really serve to render the view he claimed to support more plausible. Oh, I think yes, it does make it more plausible. I call Emacs "a program", irrespective of whether it includes other, subservient programs (like movemail, emacsclient, etc.). I don't think the definition of "program" is as monolithic as you make it sound. --=20 /L/e/k/t/u