From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Argument name for `clear-face-cache' Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 15:26:56 +0200 Message-ID: Reply-To: Juanma Barranquero NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1122903176 25977 80.91.229.2 (1 Aug 2005 13:32:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 13:32:56 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 01 15:32:54 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DzaP7-0008Lr-G7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 15:32:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DzaOw-0001AS-8S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 09:32:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DzaOR-0000zd-38 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 09:31:47 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DzaOG-0000tI-BR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 09:31:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DzaOG-0000sF-3K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 09:31:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [64.233.182.207] (helo=nproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DzaVs-0001wn-Cj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 09:39:28 -0400 Original-Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id b2so256058nfe for ; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 06:26:56 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Qgp1qyBuxqfAFAXsJlJLFKgsPIbJPUGUcozi6S/ukuTa2y7qBLem5QunM2XMzLZaYuR6WEO20XLx5G2wR5oxisN43yqaizTxjXq7uKVPSvytEnrGvVzP9XCI7rh69CRmA3rJGnRbnEd69sJmaF64NklTP2cDwTXB/PpJuKYeeUM= Original-Received: by 10.48.250.16 with SMTP id x16mr174275nfh; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 06:26:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.48.250.5 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 06:26:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: Emacs Devel Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:41400 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:41400 The argument of `clear-face-cache' is called UNLOAD-P on the Emacs Lisp Reference, but THOROUGHLY on the docstring. Which one should prevail? --=20 /L/e/k/t/u