From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *" Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:43:32 +0200 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Juanma Barranquero NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1122629453 8691 80.91.229.2 (29 Jul 2005 09:30:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:30:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, miles@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 29 11:30:47 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DyRCP-0008G1-RG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:30:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DyREu-0001eT-0x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 05:33:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DyQpT-000867-Fp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 05:06:55 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DyQkD-0006vH-VZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 05:01:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DyQk7-0006OO-5A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 05:01:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [64.233.182.204] (helo=nproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DyQeG-0003qx-51 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 04:55:20 -0400 Original-Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id b2so146012nfe for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:43:32 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hNwIC6sN6pCdCQWgxHFNSkPDE0J9WbMY/N2wWTWpMovVvFSuQ6mSPunqypXX+0fuyR3oYjPr1nlaaHsdGZ7oknddeUfhj21RtgbbkF/Ju/RDAnNRiIejukmr0rn49+A5eXa8VubO75mKtss7/0KMMa6oU2qltpcyosp07uwECMI= Original-Received: by 10.48.250.9 with SMTP id x9mr97539nfh; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:43:32 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.48.250.5 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:43:32 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: Kenichi Handa In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:41294 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:41294 On 7/29/05, Kenichi Handa wrote: > Such a cosmetic change will cause lots of conflicts in > emacs-unicode branch. Could you please postpone it until > emacs-unicode is merged? Sure. And BTW, when will it be merged? Soon after the 22.1 release? --=20 /L/e/k/t/u