From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *" Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:58:44 +0200 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Juanma Barranquero NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1122595433 7138 80.91.229.2 (29 Jul 2005 00:03:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:03:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 29 02:03:52 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DyILO-0004Vy-A1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:03:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DyINr-0008JK-Dj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:05:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DyINb-0008HN-EL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:05:35 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DyINW-0008E9-3Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:05:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DyINV-0008E1-W6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:05:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [64.233.182.205] (helo=nproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DyISI-0002zO-Eq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:10:26 -0400 Original-Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id b2so135088nfe for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:58:44 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=I4N06EaLB8yJ76Vsr2hk+WCkzD4od90wKFWFYU9AEcWOHfOsEmnnepgJbBgniYlxp5QKWPzlSjMhQs2r8hAiaauPEi3L8l+1FMYhJ624wRxH12Omje8+33yTZKY8uc2giNyhYZC9Cpv9isH+shtZvhde14eL3ipc9+ONnXbuChA= Original-Received: by 10.48.250.9 with SMTP id x9mr90424nfh; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:58:44 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.48.250.5 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:58:44 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: miles@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:41281 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:41281 And, what about the million times that w->frame is used, instead of WINDOW_FRAME (w)? --=20 /L/e/k/t/u