From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *" Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:29:30 +0200 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Juanma Barranquero NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1122595105 6370 80.91.229.2 (28 Jul 2005 23:58:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:58:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 29 01:58:23 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DyIGY-00042c-DN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:58:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DyIJ1-00062V-E5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:00:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DyIIU-0005tw-Om for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:00:19 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DyIIK-0005o7-J9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:00:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DyIIK-0005o4-G3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:00:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [64.233.182.192] (helo=nproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DyI00-0001vK-TO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:41:13 -0400 Original-Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id b2so134637nfe for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:29:30 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cJ2Uxh5J4XXRMJdT1WynVKT+c71TOf8TUGHPi/ZPbjU8VnHGWa27mlc/ougywHEWgIVuUaX3ev4JMHio3SbjBzOnCnTGJQeHAAQVLTL1izAkFLkQSJUf17To2K/xXe3fB2V6n4ngMikvQt365vyWyBrMDbBl17v87GC8q4qZqXU= Original-Received: by 10.48.250.16 with SMTP id x16mr89907nfh; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:29:30 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.48.250.5 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:29:30 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: miles@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:41280 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:41280 On 7/28/05, Miles Bader wrote: > It seems completely pointless to have an obfuscating macro (ok it's > actually a typedef) like FRAME_PTR. And other structs (like window, buffer, etc.) are used directly. > I'd say, get rid of it. Fine by me. Any objections, anyone? --=20 /L/e/k/t/u