From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *" Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:34:35 +0200 Message-ID: Reply-To: Juanma Barranquero NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1122566107 25095 80.91.229.2 (28 Jul 2005 15:55:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:55:07 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 28 17:55:06 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DyAhO-0002ZJ-5v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:53:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DyAjq-00024d-5p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:56:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DyAee-0000R7-Lo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:50:42 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DyAeO-0000JC-Oi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:50:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DyAeO-0000Cs-DV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:50:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [64.233.182.193] (helo=nproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DyAaK-0005mK-Nk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:46:12 -0400 Original-Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id b2so117372nfe for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:34:35 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Sg9afB+tYhzVqzNN9yDaV69H+cb5FDAvxt84MP1G8yDgqr/sANfc9TXBrRSLRk2iFhVhW/+AoU5iutWwxW5G13gIUuboWPwfTHW5k7tPidaPsCC9Pjetgk3LrG6Ur8qOxKRd4OWsDa9OoFj9ePSm3B09Bz6hqeIxGDprSRGyrZY= Original-Received: by 10.48.249.6 with SMTP id w6mr78273nfh; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:34:35 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.48.250.5 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:34:35 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: Emacs Devel Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:41267 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:41267 The FRAME_PTR macro seems not too successful: there are ~1300 uses of "struct frame *" on 39 files, vs. ~270 uses of FRAME_PTR on 30 files. Should this be unified, eventually? --=20 /L/e/k/t/u