From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What holds the release (was: mouse-1-click-follows-link) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 10:23:55 +0200 Message-ID: References: <17070.36649.525270.871681@farnswood.snap.net.nz> Reply-To: Juanma Barranquero NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1118825614 28926 80.91.229.2 (15 Jun 2005 08:53:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 08:53:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 15 10:53:32 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DiTdd-0007GN-VI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 10:52:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DiTio-0005dy-N1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 04:58:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DiTGA-00032Q-3M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 04:28:30 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DiTFy-0002zp-Ul for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 04:28:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DiTFw-0002wl-80 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 04:28:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [64.233.182.200] (helo=nproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DiTDC-00045C-Ua for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 04:25:27 -0400 Original-Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i2so156993nfe for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 01:23:55 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uawnQ4SrXyoitZNRr9Fx5eGRWeblms2GLkJB4P6fmFvLEpTE97qU2DpM7JFl99//efPoBmT8Yi14ENtGq8+qZ02HKrP+l6svCJfMFjsjiS/gw2hF9NGS8Uc644Mx5z9RuVsl3/A+01lrRLupxJBluu0kQANpw7geFwwhqPvTusw= Original-Received: by 10.48.4.10 with SMTP id 10mr113315nfd; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 01:23:55 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.48.250.5 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 01:23:55 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: snogglethorpe@gmail.com, miles@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:38866 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:38866 > Releasing an Emacs that crashes in recent kernels > isn't so nice... Well, of course I'm not advocating releasing an Emacs which is known to crash on recent Linux kernels. But as you also say: > [Many of the other items seem not so important to me; I suppose if > nobody can be found to fix them, many of those could just be dropped > without noticeably decreasing the quality of the release.] ...and that's exactly my point. They should be done, but there's no point on them holding the release. --=20 /L/e/k/t/u