From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What holds the release (was: mouse-1-click-follows-link) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 09:36:07 +0200 Message-ID: References: <8564wi2ag7.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <17070.36649.525270.871681@farnswood.snap.net.nz> Reply-To: Juanma Barranquero NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1118821572 17595 80.91.229.2 (15 Jun 2005 07:46:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 07:46:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 15 09:46:10 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DiSZT-0007vN-Tb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 09:44:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DiSee-0003uO-CK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 03:49:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DiSXv-00029x-Si for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 03:42:48 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DiSXs-00028o-8s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 03:42:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DiSXr-00028a-Am for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 03:42:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [64.233.182.205] (helo=nproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DiSSv-00006E-W2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 03:37:38 -0400 Original-Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i2so155219nfe for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 00:36:07 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=k2tWOdXX9TzfZ5ZbtdQFWp+Wb74D11UgjZX+bDDiZZ7tQCHPQIJ/CYh/3zbt18QLmj3tTXBAWFhJwYx/GetlEGunaopulYbLFEW1hZ/p1Le5EqjkjftyiA1kMgqrtwgKpdax1/x+6IqtQofqHJc06TMd7kWshuY9VmHsglZ4Ydo= Original-Received: by 10.48.240.15 with SMTP id n15mr112307nfh; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 00:36:07 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.48.250.5 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 00:36:07 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: snogglethorpe@gmail.com, miles@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:38864 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:38864 > Actually, looking at FOR-RELEASE, there really don't seem to be that > many mundane issues (that aren't already being handled) -- many of the > items appear to be fairly tricky or require specific knowledge. I think this strengthens my point: do FOR-RELEASE items have to hold the release, even if we don't know who/when will be able to tackle them? --=20 /L/e/k/t/u