From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: __GNUC__ == "mingw" in w32.c Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 18:05:19 +0200 Message-ID: Reply-To: Juanma Barranquero NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1118246768 31889 80.91.229.2 (8 Jun 2005 16:06:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 16:06:08 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 08 18:06:07 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dg31p-00006T-PB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 18:03:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dg38Z-0002CQ-U2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 12:10:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dg36x-0001rg-HS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 12:08:59 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dg36v-0001qj-FP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 12:08:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dg36v-0001qe-Ck for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 12:08:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [64.233.182.192] (helo=nproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Dg371-0001iO-E9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 12:09:03 -0400 Original-Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i2so69012nfe for ; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 09:05:19 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=YpazrJVGum4FigTH4ko3+c99N7A7fekOQR2Rx61sg8WsxeC6dQ2Psk5KnB6yt821PaSusu/o1bwlezrUu64Eu7Wf9PZldPivgfRtPoVxRelzRHF8Uuu3NRq82u+T08MaZYhGvG4Meh10i3RNXL30IMJ+BQdPkSwJejRIbH2QMQk= Original-Received: by 10.48.43.18 with SMTP id q18mr23663nfq; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 09:05:19 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.48.250.5 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 09:05:19 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:38345 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:38345 >>From w32.c: #ifdef _MSC_VER #define COMPILER_NAME "msvc" #else #ifdef __GNUC__ #define COMPILER_NAME "mingw" #else #define COMPILER_NAME "unknown" #endif #endif Is there any reason to consider any _GNUC_ compiler as "mingw"? Wouldn't be more sensible to use #ifdef _MSC_VER #define COMPILER_NAME "msvc" #else #ifdef __MINGW32__ #define COMPILER_NAME "mingw" #else #ifdef __GNUC__ #define COMPILER_NAME "gcc" #else #define COMPILER_NAME "unknown" #endif #endif #endif or some such? --=20 /L/e/k/t/u