From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Just a thought about comment-line Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 20:42:45 +0300 Message-ID: References: <306c7cf5-6cfc-436e-a902-8ad4560b32d1@default> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="97137"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams , Yuri Khan , PEDRO ANDRES ARANDA GUTIERREZ Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 31 19:49:15 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jfS5D-000PBg-OR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 31 May 2020 19:49:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36008 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jfS5C-0000vz-M1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 31 May 2020 13:49:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34714) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jfRz0-0002ep-RB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 May 2020 13:42:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x42b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42b]:42312) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jfRyz-0005LC-NV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 May 2020 13:42:50 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id p5so3259349wrw.9 for ; Sun, 31 May 2020 10:42:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KUMd7xhpFzwvZyWHd17gnN1NzSM/wv/ueSxURrT5Qhs=; b=tusQBdL4Uq3wXmIs7Kkv1cMTHmMFkXo7BzH2jrrNov2/vjSKmjEkkY+raNLIwQsBqx L5O+NiCV5ZEhAO5yCr+9+yLD/maLjrBzus9SohEukcOtW4AdyLKvV7sbznF8usUGex0e fWEld3kxSGLFNdzqRufuAZ/JftndVlPC+UVxsVxuPV29OUgoWZ9wUzyVZ3t5da5vl6tz qbGez+aFDCjIiNxH+NHN0O02n/om2JlKhKlb/xhXQjshBN/+K5tdAE8OZHSCsiGQTZxX BJ4auS8yuOE9R7EUsPg0ntbx5gLtjFSYS09nAfoNfUkVZ6PYhG08Wn7IVuRfYldVxcOs bJ6Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KUMd7xhpFzwvZyWHd17gnN1NzSM/wv/ueSxURrT5Qhs=; b=YsMUre84xz8OryO7mP7v1rlbf0VB4z/sQjSmsvGzLJ3ffTVaankzdhYIlMSeTIKM/i HOfd2RQjqdVmdWzoMgZpnyZbFvdRY6opvPb/FQrqyS+DNPzblqLR3F0mWmc15Pkg1lsT DbOqxaDUOR1ZSGXlx/ez7ApD5vgCKPmdUxHYziCucmsfLgeaZfSc7cZHrKNezPEel0SC lb17sRQei00qehrJ04A3sd672N5uNNsDa22wboV0Rq+oH2GTmETD4ZvUm21peFM7Zc/T f+oVvdlxQwbEnz0CQ6mwEPbse2snX7doEDyDFJ3JquYyqnu6DUqCtp5JdVqLtQJMWWLV 8RWQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53228GClrCV7S86JvsGoCew3gZhluS3GNwVI4KwRlsovtmeIhsoo w0fh7Bet6W+CebaEDtXwF5idLHCv X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw7otamafA6XM+nwatROX65B/50J7Bc/OVbmxf+oPrU/gxOo4ZmURa1ksUB9P3S+vwa/kCBoQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:fd4b:: with SMTP id h11mr17733604wrs.209.1590946968087; Sun, 31 May 2020 10:42:48 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.3] ([66.205.73.129]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id u4sm8454376wmb.48.2020.05.31.10.42.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 31 May 2020 10:42:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <306c7cf5-6cfc-436e-a902-8ad4560b32d1@default> Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::42b; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x42b.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:251689 Archived-At: On 31.05.2020 19:58, Drew Adams wrote: > For block commenting, `comment-dwim' doesn't let > you nest and unnest a given level of commenting, > and control the number of comment chars used, etc. If your job is writing code (and not, say, comment accounting and management), I'm fairly sure the functionality provided there is well sufficient.