From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-25 10597c9: Don't use 'find-program' Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 23:06:19 +0300 Message-ID: References: <20160411164301.22548.38008@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <83potpbwbb.fsf@gnu.org> <83h9f1bcvd.fsf@gnu.org> <83poto9lu0.fsf@gnu.org> <26f2840a-f6fb-770b-d7ae-5757123b7bd9@yandex.ru> <83fuug6pi2.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1461182800 23351 80.91.229.3 (20 Apr 2016 20:06:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 20:06:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rgm@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 20 22:06:35 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1asyOQ-0008H1-0E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 22:06:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55663 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1asyOP-0008Np-2M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:06:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41220) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1asyOJ-0008HN-TV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:06:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1asyOE-00024n-P3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:06:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x244.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::244]:36630) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1asyOE-00024d-HR; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:06:22 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-x244.google.com with SMTP id l6so16626437wml.3; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 13:06:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MJ2Q65VRjPEzBzigD0GzkfxRAeKdi3g+SVDC3VnP1c4=; b=wCWG+ZKdQATpp9Mbz4vM9HRPrj83XAiZjPeF2+iWoVJADDdzEd8FZtfVK4MGxe9oJa 1ZPjkEkOt0k16evXH0cLTbFTNqgnGTUE3xbt0o9uqIIA3iRnOVlTHJYoR7xBPHLfXVb5 EPSKE6hvIuwv/Qx5/j0bjXQYPjLoLKTIRtFXQHYqlcJSi/hcKOSAHrdZl4EjctkaKxv0 wHS5qeRbM+FxPc05cvppnDk7o3NBGbSzis9NDPd9/yRew5knyaFriEvVqjTcxm6JsmaM p/TR/dnoPSph/6azThIM6HSyX7xMBAZZbOaIl1MBHFQFVa2D6Xf+PZDlcwZ5Y6NhnIqo ZFPA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MJ2Q65VRjPEzBzigD0GzkfxRAeKdi3g+SVDC3VnP1c4=; b=fQhA69hJm90N5zWcGvqokc1ovlpFkWmrgERPNKLtza+FesbrriQ84aOtAfclVgkOyp M6TrF8J/FeoXyKc8Qp26Efs8Pnc/5l1j4mGNNua6SW+L3Z9OPoARDfhd7b6GSYN8/IQF WvB6pRXabr9Xd4tsJOE3w4weyGIy89PKerzm5lNAFryJTbCmRYNnMshIWPxaRs0Zu4p4 yCkQbay92kPu7TIxn/f4m1+neZtGMIciJ6SQYg269LKy4DnPKp5gCGZThd3W7DxfTRdF ZfUXUB13cvncXeCFNTrHrwG6TxWJRYhUfcjCjnh/x8x69tNZec4tnYiILxRKEzMn9HjQ X8qw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUQtr+ZVnan2DF8xV4QuVwqzoSh/jLf+kZhnAv1ZPVc3JwGNB8nsN1BlPd6KKlfVQ== X-Received: by 10.28.4.194 with SMTP id 185mr10326702wme.11.1461182781916; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 13:06:21 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.175.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id w186sm11238049wmd.20.2016.04.20.13.06.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 20 Apr 2016 13:06:21 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 In-Reply-To: <83fuug6pi2.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::244 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203135 Archived-At: On 04/20/2016 10:37 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I thought about something like that, but decided that I'm not sure > this is better than having just several independent values. Then each > option keeps its default value irrespective of the others, and the > user doesn't have to review all of them whenever she changes the value > of find-program. > > Does this make sense? If you don't expect anybody to want to customize all (or most) of them to the same non-default value, yes. Otherwise, I agree with Stefan.