From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16251: 24.3.50; `icomplete-mode' breaks my file opening now Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 08:01:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: References: <<497ebd3d-d69b-4ac4-9d8c-ca2f4a1a2ac1@default>> <> <<818df3a7-a5fa-4871-86e1-0bd5d8e4a5fc@default>> <<83y5352wae.fsf@gnu.org>> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1388247552 21766 80.91.229.3 (28 Dec 2013 16:19:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 16:19:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16251@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 28 17:19:17 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VwwMG-0003Hh-6r for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 17:03:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52587 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VwwMF-0005hJ-O4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 11:03:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34421) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VwwM3-0005h9-K4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 11:03:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VwwLu-00082o-QY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 11:03:11 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34643) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VwwLu-00082i-Nm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 11:03:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VwwLu-0008Ar-04 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 11:03:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 16:03:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16251 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16251-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16251.138824652731351 (code B ref 16251); Sat, 28 Dec 2013 16:03:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16251) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Dec 2013 16:02:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48662 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VwwL0-00089a-RS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 11:02:07 -0500 Original-Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:48626) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VwwKy-00089S-Ae for 16251@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 11:02:04 -0500 Original-Received: from acsinet21.oracle.com (acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id rBSG22MJ002432 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 28 Dec 2013 16:02:03 GMT Original-Received: from aserz7022.oracle.com (aserz7022.oracle.com [141.146.126.231]) by acsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBSG21x6027511 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 28 Dec 2013 16:02:02 GMT Original-Received: from abhmp0016.oracle.com (abhmp0016.oracle.com [141.146.116.22]) by aserz7022.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBSG21nO009354; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 16:02:01 GMT In-Reply-To: <<83y5352wae.fsf@gnu.org>> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.8 (707110) [OL 12.0.6680.5000 (x86)] X-Source-IP: acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:82691 Archived-At: > > completion-all-completions: 680 ms > > deleting duplicates: 70 ms > > sorting: 470 ms > > > > Of course, sorting depends on the sort predicate. This was with > > a directories-first-then-alphabetical sort. >=20 > How much time does sorting take if you request just alphabetical, > without directories-first? It should take zero on Windows; if it > doesn't, our sorting algorithm should be improved. I no longer have the debugging set up for this (calls to `message' etc., since it is impossible to use the debugger with Icomplete). =20 But IIRC it was not very different from that. But this the sorting I use here is the Icicles sorting, so the efficiency of its implementation should be irrelevant to emacs -Q. That is, if Icicle mode is on, I use the current Icicles sort function.