From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31138: Native json slower than json.el Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 01:04:13 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87sh806xwa.fsf@chapu.is> <83va09nwg3.fsf@gnu.org> <83tvftne0j.fsf@gnu.org> <40DA9396-044E-4D00-946E-42B776B51BFA@gnu.org> <83r2awnw0w.fsf@gnu.org> <83d0mgnn31.fsf@gnu.org> <835zs7och6.fsf@gnu.org> <83tvfqnbxc.fsf@gnu.org> <83lg12n75s.fsf@gnu.org> <83h8bqn2ik.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="43823"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1 Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien?= Chapuis , 31138@debbugs.gnu.org To: yyoncho , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 26 00:05:10 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h8YeU-000BFR-Jo for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 00:05:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49729 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h8YeT-0006Yo-Kr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 19:05:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56483) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h8YeN-0006Yg-Ha for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 19:05:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h8YeM-0008Qd-HN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 19:05:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45250) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h8YeM-0008QZ-AO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 19:05:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h8YeM-0004z9-4W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 19:05:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 23:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31138 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 31138-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31138.155355506719113 (code B ref 31138); Mon, 25 Mar 2019 23:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31138) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Mar 2019 23:04:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58794 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h8Ydm-0004yB-N6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 19:04:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lj1-f182.google.com ([209.85.208.182]:33161) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h8Ydk-0004xv-FW for 31138@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 19:04:25 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lj1-f182.google.com with SMTP id f23so9417228ljc.0 for <31138@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 16:04:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lx4y/FTUcLF8F4OElZ2TX9NqWQepYkeCXbkOZjy118Q=; b=kVkMCzsTaEIH1KuXMpkRsmsKagOZNHkWvpKBy7AWpJPh0jvU5nid+BSXANGyx6ZU1A BhvJ/YaebvY8jhY8rUxVtEL+g6ZZHXNzzvHHRc4DyuP8sc+UqadVq+9BNYaBmTg37/Lh z4EqaM82UwNG9snyOvP/R9Z1pb0QObI8KKQ7NQA0KpWxBV3sVZE+WZk2xkr9SJLPOmrb yqeIAZTmeN5bjdzeAJ5AjToLMLSGMevOl9HVjafJzaYIPK3ov7eu/Sm5lcK1pH3BsN8q 8Z0BiFe8NWOF2TN1MeEtMN7G/F1Vyr4tmjD6kiJ8BDFY8iPQe9xuva3Xq2BInDNRrOBy 8zAQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=lx4y/FTUcLF8F4OElZ2TX9NqWQepYkeCXbkOZjy118Q=; b=n6fk+CF5tfhpa6u0pJWYiqOVSPGdqo/E/PBEdKUTsNnQaSnHUqv78JnLTzC/OiVpDz FlhqjEHna6nsTxW8lZ0qNOlBxfJd/N6efvKIMiR1Y9DypoOuNFbVxYxoyIT7rIlxTfQ+ ayRxaq9qW9TYj0dNp1DcC2S9/BL2npgE7gMQKFEqBo/SX9zbxW+N5ydPzf/SWCtgok7k s3+vc8iuwECkVryxROBjQJHh4exZ+3JS8s3mcnzNKSCFN+2w2CwbiP6sRvueFIipBSJb ObWIqfwZE51Ls91ooqPwUCysQ+joK9SQBqVmRerfrsTWPIFBx/5wzmv7viuYRpTkKnWR tLQA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWX3+4CXaLgw0xGgRwfNQ23CLWuZxqNkYu6ZBG6D/ocG0Y0AELF fPwexuRur3cOx4MTZ+5MGRAE+JQY X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzn5dhuf2Qudwpfy370hKeiZKeNtuINL3cbRi4m+BtYDtON56Nxr+c9+2Q+HrAVdc0fFv7vgA== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8906:: with SMTP id d6mr13199101lji.152.1553555057905; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 16:04:17 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([185.105.174.23]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id q29sm1605916ljc.8.2019.03.25.16.04.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 25 Mar 2019 16:04:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:156794 Archived-At: Hi Ivan, On 25.03.2019 23:34, yyoncho wrote: > PS: I really enjoy the ironical passive-aggressive style of > communication which I guess is common for emacs-devel but I will still > be trying to be constructive. I just want you to know that I won't > bother answering and focus only on the stuff that will help to solve the > issue... While the recent message clarified quite a bit, the preceding ones were not so easy to interpret, and to understand that you applied the necessary rigor when benchmarking, and which results you got. I'm not sure where you see the "ironical" style of conversation, but maybe some questions seemed rhetorical to you. I'm pretty sure they weren't. P.S. Way to go to label the whole mailing list as "passive-aggressive" while calling yourself "constructive".