From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25222: Incorrect indices in ansi-color (227e996946d4629fa8f6d665564a37668290c87f, new in Emacs 25) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:46:42 -0500 Message-ID: References: <727f1fe3-3f61-02c8-5858-1f87ccfb54f5@live.com> <83k2a0cleq.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UrrfFEXvXNPMmehqm1WoAvboXJqlcJDFP" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1484239845 26572 195.159.176.226 (12 Jan 2017 16:50:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 16:50:45 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 Cc: 25222@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 12 17:50:41 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cRia3-0005C8-UT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 17:50:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35153 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cRia8-0004e8-3v for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:50:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51720) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cRiWs-00021R-8g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:47:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cRiWn-0002E5-S0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:47:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36340) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cRiWk-0002Bf-KU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:47:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cRiWk-0002Tf-EW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:47:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 16:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25222 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25222-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25222.14842396219513 (code B ref 25222); Thu, 12 Jan 2017 16:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25222) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jan 2017 16:47:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51739 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cRiWi-0002TN-Ry for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:47:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([217.72.192.74]:62057) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cRiWh-0002TA-CY for 25222@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:47:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [18.111.103.8] ([18.111.103.8]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue104 [212.227.15.184]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M6lu8-1cdjZ51cY8-00wVqg; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 17:46:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83k2a0cleq.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ZoCmLP/qRRySiAeMsTCx32JDFS0OPKPCj7MrLiNf8vpEKGcXXof 8zqZ1IewjXfliws/IuuCZwVoY2+XkATLugE9MwPbr0ZYx+4/3rCyF+U4XGz9kQQkCq6HXg1 rb5Z+svDrM8bdwhRxL7g8H+ywzPVDu6kMzu7jo7HEr3CZZ3Oo2nZ80xT0KO3YzFhEDy67cn PiDuS1hnPrVB55+cj/f8w== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:OO7BJ9hwVv4=:JuOE92XOBQAU3Upqb3Y0LC B4ziH6nV1qMVgSbTrahe7CyahsLLuWRwisCEZc0BgVkVJ2sWyauD3RKhBmf9RAjkmeWZhJjJ4 1iCoRrXNFprmfXn8OFje3WybM7yo81/qAaVnkVdNNX6VSbJqfZQwm/7X5zGTuqMhns/4VLDHr E2beVtUamxvRjjjtYFQ+SSL7CbPG+dM+oQhwBNYYYLrnjDKmsUnJUabaE+vaMIZICfznhIHQk XpFqHd50mBFcvm31oC7t6WIFlpgRe1yXl7vNF1HVjIRhXpsxieZwccMkkXYj6iwlc9sXyZW3c QZLhLGE4QnFoVWF7n5A9VNd63pkvk9a7PdSb+JpyvzveHMQanUegPAY00FslcFFvRahqrReZS b+HWTvbLZ0XS6zKs5+1yzfP+l0KBwmIK65pG7BIJU+PTSELR7lA5RQzBpFO4PfyujxJh/50dj JJUoyAUaQYWr00nt06TwsRrz7o2E/006Pu7OwM82AbiSfyPgsNnzcJoyOQ8KiUquJNDqAvtf9 hP6YabQJ/OMcExVPJXy+bKJooCUshjvZjXTvwVLGrSwhXKyVnSqevd1w+/OvD2tIPYUuqvt5u U7Dh/r4yRPwmEmFrPQI0eXvnHysdM5qb18O1MgMU2h8+CWpOQS2llbGgACSgaYfocyKH550PO z7jDLYv36V/xRHC7pljDcKae+If7zhjJ54GxCWpQoZst4UbRWjGfFAz0Z7ba/GWdFask= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:128037 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --UrrfFEXvXNPMmehqm1WoAvboXJqlcJDFP Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="MkkPWCQG5DJktwG7Qog8k4s5Tjj2iCXrU"; protected-headers="v1" From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= To: Eli Zaretskii , Glenn Morris Cc: 25222@debbugs.gnu.org, Daniel Colascione Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#25222: Incorrect indices in ansi-color (227e996946d4629fa8f6d665564a37668290c87f, new in Emacs 25) References: <727f1fe3-3f61-02c8-5858-1f87ccfb54f5@live.com> <83k2a0cleq.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83k2a0cleq.fsf@gnu.org> --MkkPWCQG5DJktwG7Qog8k4s5Tjj2iCXrU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2017-01-12 11:06, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Glenn Morris >> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 13:24:31 -0500 >> Cc: 25222@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> There are several reports about this. Eg 24223, 21381, 24189. >> Perhaps this is something to fix for 25.2. >=20 > I agree, and would encourage people to hurry with patches for these > problems, because RC1 of 25.2 is probably due in a week or two. I posted a potential solution in a previous message, but I was hoping for= the original author (Daniel) to comment on it. Otherwise, I don't feel = too comfortable touching that code. Cheers, Cl=E9ment. --MkkPWCQG5DJktwG7Qog8k4s5Tjj2iCXrU-- --UrrfFEXvXNPMmehqm1WoAvboXJqlcJDFP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYd7LyAAoJEPqg+cTm90wjZoYP/2pPrujRFUHN7JYlAkNqMu9/ Nair7FexMJoyRkcVpd05Rf/cdpYDOXp4AQqZ3CQ+NrFNlrR3kJir4qRuQHueDtfY 9+cCy+MCHSr1HN9DsIKYH+OyNzV/g7n6pcUFBntSnMScHioZgWaaFhtI1V6FbbU9 XfX4xiqfMLSVG7c027lKWIQVx4SRIIhnpo7chd4/to6C8fRpP/bIaeuu8KCeTCzO zeXRq34xYtSQYsyJXvlQPwYmVxG9fFs4+c8DIfsYz3Lz5Q6lzJrnk7Suart4sU3K +OGaLMFnd+YI2Gc7OuKvrVxUigk1oiAt5yP54aDSzYz5CYTHw6HWzT6BndDloLQo o4VDaZIFGfvrfp/R5qKUYrdywYz7AYW1OyYX6ZvCp9ll7rGS8TdjYkUAuZ/nzXzT PGPZCjX/Q22YqCS51WNut27AZqmIylPjSS0xUBgzC8u2SoYddKgHvG9LyLyICi00 SMnGIv8uc2j0nr5nPw7ErLd/fr36inL6pcOTse/RKKefLPyeie8jM/JiTwGrSMNf f/Hk0D/ySGjBLmziNL+vGW+wiQLR2URUyjA0g+viCjY2dnN/i7ySCFpS8XsR5yFq U3qoKxIYiw6XNP+JG0+e5PdQy5jC4btggOMsVuvLDngr8nemtkN/bj+7us3cVTh+ P0YDX/uEqea3q4Ncae9+ =obkn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UrrfFEXvXNPMmehqm1WoAvboXJqlcJDFP--