From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Maciej Katafiasz Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Emacs and C++ codesense Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 10:06:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <1177512998.732034.286160@s33g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <877irueq2c.fsf@gmail.com> <87vefaw78q.fsf@gmail.com> <87r6pwlq9h.fsf@gmail.com> <87odl0sjqc.fsf@gmail.com> <87odl0po00.fsf@pdrechsler.de> <87hcqseev3.fsf@gmail.com> <87vef8l2qe.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1178359633 12554 80.91.229.12 (5 May 2007 10:07:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 10:07:13 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 05 12:07:11 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HkHAU-00078d-RT for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 May 2007 12:07:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HkHHD-0004mv-NI for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 May 2007 06:14:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HkHGv-0004kx-Sk for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2007 06:13:50 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HkHGt-0004gp-8z for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2007 06:13:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HkHGt-0004gm-2r for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2007 06:13:47 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HkHA8-0007SS-UM for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2007 06:06:49 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HkHA1-0005Ps-Nc for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2007 12:06:41 +0200 Original-Received: from users.kollegienet.dk ([130.226.173.22]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 May 2007 12:06:41 +0200 Original-Received: from mathrick by users.kollegienet.dk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 May 2007 12:06:41 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 30 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: users.kollegienet.dk User-Agent: pan 0.120 (Plate of Shrimp) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:43725 Archived-At: Den Fri, 04 May 2007 23:04:41 +0200 skrev Hadron: >>> This is all good but how did you do these things? Do you have >>> accompanying instructions/tutorial? >> >> Not in any organised manner, no. It's just a demonstration of some simple >> (more or less) functions of several packages I use, amongst them semantic >> and related tools. The tooltip completion you can see I posted not so long >> ago to emacs-sources, it's called semantic-hover-completion.el. Version >> 0.1 is very buggy, though, so it's not really very usable for anyone who >> isn't me. Unfortunately, I won't have the time to fix that in the >> immediate feature. > > ok, so it wasn't a demo of what semantic can do. It was a mish mash of > different things not likely to be reproduced by anyone but yourself :-; But of course, large parts of it were due to semantic usage. You asked how it can fit C coding, this is my answer. > Why did you do your own completion? What was wrong with intellisense? > Have you used intellisense? Uhh, this *is* intellisense. At least as long as you regard "intellisense" as a generic description and not trademarked name by MSFT. I wrote it because the existing completion popups for semantic were not close enonugh to the original IntelliSense, or rather, diverged in ways that seriously hindered their usefulness. Cheers, Maciej