From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59935: 29.0.60; project-list-buffers is slow Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 20:51:30 +0200 Message-ID: References: <86a63vi2lu.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <4a78ffcc-15fb-27ac-48b9-82fe84c596aa@yandex.ru> <86bko9na29.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <119c73c2-b219-5ee6-6fb3-c92d7ffea37d@yandex.ru> <864jtztcqs.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13070"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 Cc: 59935@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 13 19:52:21 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p5AO5-0003Cn-4P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 19:52:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p5ANs-00023M-FV; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 13:52:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p5ANo-00022w-38 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 13:52:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p5ANm-0001Mh-KT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 13:52:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p5ANm-0006Ai-7W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 13:52:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 18:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59935 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 59935-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59935.167095750023713 (code B ref 59935); Tue, 13 Dec 2022 18:52:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 59935) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Dec 2022 18:51:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33999 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p5ANQ-0006AP-EF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 13:51:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f52.google.com ([209.85.221.52]:40846) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p5ANO-0006AJ-OY for 59935@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 13:51:39 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f52.google.com with SMTP id m14so16680799wrh.7 for <59935@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 10:51:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=jxTNiiAIdle44zr9o+z1nq2Q6O2t1qDmHPR/00XPuFw=; b=GPFuRJdsQpGxQwEMRbsGSqQ9A8PXeC1XR287uJwmtGvqulupdH08vtVCmib4QBUJaR 0qF7ylwuzsZSKOBgwNLrF+eIITT1V61gV+RNNBu1+sy0zrJQGKyWR6mgN0UGshGxvfpi ZPhSJ8e8V+QWrJyqHKDLVIEFGKOD/BCdeFPdlSD/1QlrXGvFm6KneB00fhkYG+wNuyNG s5RSGTMs3jyjCMKnyTQUKwTSJKQA4eGnT4mL6TlYOuwWolmVSYymMuJJ1ttyhdBkn431 Fg82W6HCSHsh2v6rjEEcbJ+gNi79TYlAcAYti8oDNF75x5OVBuV8NZ5sE3d01x1oXfcR +ceA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=jxTNiiAIdle44zr9o+z1nq2Q6O2t1qDmHPR/00XPuFw=; b=XeZ2sS4HW6WS5rm4gY1yBHS7AaAd3nr9lyMfpN9GbNKavivS1cnX2yyIz3huZDloYt sGnk3ym3SP6YgjHONwTmPg7ClkMb7PdPiRSD4pgiJUmXDRUCoN3YurCEbU7sY6Et/7Lw h/RdBDlmI5kKatbg58Flm/Z1l0669pPy7PIkKh4K74vpDJO+79jTP540dFVi4nSaQDhu 6sAb42LZoSAetWa48Un0f3gIxg+CVlce6dbd4ZNsjVTwxWBcrvbbMbSHut/gP4a72g+V 4C5RovkIKaE/Z5t5BY/9hldhVkEwBjbGaFPib4Mx4WSdohEwj1TMYWBxXWejjJ5qmnX9 zCrA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pnKZLoaRvJP+mU4qyLja3xRtjpexlLdTXw/BIXtfcK0T6aTZDlS vP3XrUKGc7D9gX0IgqcFO6o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf6z5I8WNHGkfxtDjUQrLnN9rtWPdJMXu0gdK1CElbFVqHYKiLlxvJhoJOLKuylh/Dc0WjD6qA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4848:0:b0:242:8b69:cf2b with SMTP id n8-20020a5d4848000000b002428b69cf2bmr14783260wrs.47.1670957492460; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 10:51:32 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.2] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id j14-20020a5d564e000000b0024165454262sm556620wrw.11.2022.12.13.10.51.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 13 Dec 2022 10:51:31 -0800 (PST) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <864jtztcqs.fsf@mail.linkov.net> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:250881 Archived-At: On 13/12/2022 19:49, Juri Linkov wrote: >> Here's an idea: when 'list-buffers-noselect' received a plain list of >> buffers in its BUFFER-LIST argument, it doesn't save that anywhere. >> >> That seems like a bug, doesn't it? That hitting 'g' in such a buffer-list >> buffer resets its contents to all buffer (except hidden, etc). >> >> So it probably makes sense to save it as well. >> >> Long story short, I suggest to name the new variable >> Buffer-menu-buffer-list, and save the value of the BUFFER-LIST argument to >> it no matter what. And, likewise, use it. But when the value is a function, >> call it to obtain the actual list. > > Thanks for the idea. Implemented in the commit a99d0e7e6c9. Thank you. >> One side-effect of this, though, is that the BUFFER-LIST argument to >> list-buffers--refresh will have no purpose anymore. > > I'm not sure about removing the old argument BUFFER-LIST from > list-buffers--refresh, even though it's an internal function. Maybe sometime later on master. > It also has another argument OLD-BUFFER that could be turned later > into buffer-local, to keep the current buffer marker after revert. Why not. Although at that point which of the buffers was current previously doesn't seem too important.