From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59935: 29.0.60; project-list-buffers is slow Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2022 21:19:30 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83o7sby8yk.fsf@gnu.org> <33ee7805-b5ee-ce62-042f-d980184e327e@yandex.ru> <838rjfy0kx.fsf@gnu.org> <2fe25562-401b-1b7b-d3fd-8d0820f4567c@yandex.ru> <83h6y3wco8.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3527"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 Cc: 59935@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 10 20:20:25 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p45Oa-0000j8-DU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 20:20:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p45OK-0004qu-JE; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 14:20:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p45OE-0004qj-DE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 14:20:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p45OE-0004Lh-4z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 14:20:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p45OD-0004vi-SX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 14:20:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2022 19:20:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59935 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 59935-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59935.167069998118929 (code B ref 59935); Sat, 10 Dec 2022 19:20:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 59935) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2022 19:19:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44582 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p45Nt-0004vF-0V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 14:19:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f46.google.com ([209.85.128.46]:44771) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p45Nq-0004v7-UD for 59935@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 14:19:39 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f46.google.com with SMTP id b24-20020a05600c4a9800b003d21efdd61dso560118wmp.3 for <59935@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 11:19:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AbUV5cb70vvrNLlH9QA7F2kADoQmdY8bbq4QBzbOc4g=; b=gIaYa7PE7i/7fW8a/Iy9oaEM5HFhcF6MO+xGVaMRBAE02MN+i2pR7axuDKSz4B9Fve hqE0dbYMmKZqfcFXtmbG3NzbJQgC9/LxOBL1zeQUYfOGmInnRlTUEjvjKcpY4PWIS/h9 yf7M3cayVPb9+LkedsBcNcrjQ5H2ffrmMFaHZk7lM9qp6XXzrHAhtEG7NaxSkcw8LHOO UefmI+Jvt+1wHt/2sXgGjOuKNS5HhuT9eCAlSbMOqFFIWDKUGQMs2VitU87VjNtEXT99 bm7Kge7apz383m7vx+AZJytqoq58UMs0L6ZQkGyh/GIxZCJGnlmgZKE1dUlUIQck1g2o FZcA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=AbUV5cb70vvrNLlH9QA7F2kADoQmdY8bbq4QBzbOc4g=; b=XTMhBJVRw+xMKotucsRwlxl4uKdMN2uYcg6EwkZMZe32ITETGtXY8LAB5IuuCnFF1y rizihJqXnXIO5WkZMEBMmZ3FzChW79oKr2Nlkyf4h9ucXqB3BUFP74tst1qD+Gd3cNno FpQA7C9GpcOtpiVQlhPHubS/nyRxk4q63Y8qsaNOow2yX8vwVNYM5KBani8EwkK5bbNs gZaQZZ21zdtE2z8auXX2Q8yWXlAYnF2SQc9HrycYOehIJ/dln7TCy854/KAS137e63Ep 8lcYkD8oRrGOkeoCiwGy3g6tJln823RhJVGobGTo66nig2y4kgsKC93ZfEsZS0+7v8wC 1+Pw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pnsdV1cQvy+FR5n446779vRz3EIWb6N94brSg0HlVimWdoY8o8h BcrMdstLZF0zTUwT+LBZvHs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf6chQ5Q39a8YK8D6cbYvVa/pNp3Q9ro1gVx3FIBCBXo6Ou4hNvCy1efuvgvYxmqUGTayhxcLQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2d07:b0:3d1:ee3a:62ae with SMTP id x7-20020a05600c2d0700b003d1ee3a62aemr8136492wmf.8.1670699972841; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 11:19:32 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.2] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id k32-20020a05600c1ca000b003b4ff30e566sm21348670wms.3.2022.12.10.11.19.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 10 Dec 2022 11:19:32 -0800 (PST) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <83h6y3wco8.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:250547 Archived-At: On 10/12/2022 16:33, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > OK, but I didn't suggest making any changes to revert-buffer-function > set up by "C-x p C-b". You can still use process-buffers there, and > it shouldn't slow down "C-x p C-b" itself, since the call to > process-buffers that is part of revert-buffer-function is not supposed > to be evaluated when you set revert-buffer-function. Right? Or what > else am I missing? Then only the 'g' binding will remain slow. An improvement, of course. But if we go this route, then we don't use the "new" list-buffers-noselect convention either, so we might as well do the full fix.