From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10539: 24.0.92; low display-time-interval makes Emacs slow Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:43:50 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87zkdl93r0.fsf@web.de> <6162fwu92z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83y5ssxlrx.fsf@gnu.org> <4F23D703.4080202@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327779863 10719 80.91.229.3 (28 Jan 2012 19:44:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 19:44:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, 10539@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 28 20:44:22 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RrECD-0004x6-I0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:44:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52034 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrECC-0005b2-Mn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:44:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42391) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrECA-0005aw-FA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:44:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrEC9-00084y-BH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:44:18 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43163) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrEC9-00084u-6k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:44:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrECr-00040e-KC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:45:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 19:45:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10539 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10539-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10539.132777987915372 (code B ref 10539); Sat, 28 Jan 2012 19:45:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10539) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jan 2012 19:44:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48550 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrECU-0003zs-Ao for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:44:39 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:49287 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrECS-0003zl-AE for 10539@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:44:36 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrEBi-0006RI-LA; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:43:50 -0500 X-Spook: Qaddafi lock picking MP5K-SD North Korea Baranyi AMEMB X-Ran: .}!58lqK<$SjvHsZ\uK7/3'Uzj?'ePm\d)\sDmcn|./RcP/{_&E)!5:C\Tfa*|?.~;-/9p X-Hue: white X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <4F23D703.4080202@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:07:47 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56144 Archived-At: martin rudalics wrote: > indicates that this function exclusively relies on obscure side effects > which are not documented anywhere. Yes, that was basically my point. Which is presumably why it does other stuff that has no obvious relation to mode-lines ("forces recomputation of the menu bar menus and the frame title"). But this is probably off-topic for this report.