From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bozhidar Batsov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: SMIE Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 15:00:27 +0300 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="53f1eadb_75a2a8d4_118e6" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1408363267 16942 80.91.229.3 (18 Aug 2014 12:01:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 12:01:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: chad , Matt DeBoard , emacs To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 18 14:01:02 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XJLcT-0003gc-Ue for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 14:01:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43411 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XJLcT-0001Hk-LN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:01:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34374) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XJLc5-0001AT-ND for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:00:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XJLc0-0005Or-0H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:00:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wg0-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e]:45122) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XJLbz-0005Mc-Mb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:00:31 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id m15so4819537wgh.17 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 05:00:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:content-type; bh=xx6Z9rcuq3bpLZSbEqXmSsXeF1h6CgHTBvXu/n8wRng=; b=eDo5D40mCpXpRSCj1lrsab+5rR9vX9yVJCG45AM1janKh8tHX+bQmJglJJi1KxKws8 sjkGbjH8VDT7ZYJqZR6Kp8vxyBZvw0idNGm1iNm0WzZncswMmWle09BCwEfhelXKPUKl t+sD47mDmdrbeAPZgPWtJ578ObiJnl6hPX/8yQtA7CR0OJQFfU0BcV/qFugWoE8IeZ/e /5byce2AefKT2Rev8ND6kttDEHqHkglNbLTyV374YQPEFeWDeXhknDGW+mqQTTC89Lne 5DpA3xUSKaDn4dAhHWcHvOcIzhZYXiPh8cnBx/7P8a6eBY7OGAOgoGrSGw9Nu/GMQSeT kdVA== X-Received: by 10.180.74.240 with SMTP id x16mr74630048wiv.13.1408363230553; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 05:00:30 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Bozhidars-MacBook-Pro.local ([95.87.231.111]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id c8sm41799994wjw.6.2014.08.18.05.00.28 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 18 Aug 2014 05:00:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Airmail (247) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:173738 Archived-At: --53f1eadb_75a2a8d4_118e6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On August 17, 2014 at 2:55:10 PM, Stefan Monnier (monnier=40iro.umontreal= .ca) wrote: > You=E2=80=99ll also have to stop accepting non-trivial contributions fr= om=C2=A0 > people who haven=E2=80=99t signed the document.=C2=A0 Not quite, no. You simply have to ask them to sign the=C2=A0 copyright paperwork. Most people are willing to do that in my experience.= =C2=A0 Stefan=C2=A0 My point isn=E2=80=99t that people aren=E2=80=99t willing sign the copyri= ght agreement in principle, but that many people will not be thrilled to deal with a *paper* copyright agreement that they have to send via standa= rd mail and wait for a couple of weeks to get back a response, just to get a tiny fix/change accepted. I think that GNU= projects would benefit a lot from a contributor agreement that can be signed digitally. (Clojure=E2=80=99s development recently switched to dig= ital contributor agreements and the number of people who signed the agree= ment skyrocketed). People hate dealing with paperwork and that=E2=80=99s a fact of life... --53f1eadb_75a2a8d4_118e6 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline