From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Richard G Riley <rileyrgdev@googlemail.com>
Subject: http://orgmode.org/org.html - org-agenda-to-appt
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 20:51:18 +0200
Message-ID: <ersl4cw6s9.fsf@home.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IhV2F-0001w9-Iu
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:51:27 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IhV2C-0001vS-Vk
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:51:27 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IhV2C-0001vK-SG
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:51:24 -0400
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.188])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rileyrgdev@googlemail.com>) id 1IhV2C-000183-Dy
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:51:24 -0400
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so1468924nfh
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: org-mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>


Just FYI : in 5.12c I tried 

org-agenda-to-appt as documented here:

http://orgmode.org/org.html#Weekly_002fDaily-agenda

but it doesn't appear to exist. I realise that the online doc is
probably a bit out of date with the development going on.

In addition, I would like to suggest that a "make install" also invokes
a "make doc" and/or "make install-info".