From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: egarrulo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Emacs doesn't see the most recent version of Company Mode hosted on Elpa Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 22:18:54 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1495052428 8541 195.159.176.226 (17 May 2017 20:20:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 20:20:28 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 17 22:20:25 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dB5Ql-00027Q-6P for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 22:20:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50613 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dB5Qq-0000m5-D8 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 16:20:28 -0400 Original-Path: usenet.stanford.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 2 Original-X-Trace: individual.net DT+I2QHqlm4/SnH/pGnYdAb/Nq6jDAOYmQmTvSDg2cNJgS/94H Cancel-Lock: sha1:VI/k1469zZP+uCi1pZZAq15shjA= In-Reply-To: Original-Xref: usenet.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:219123 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:113050 Archived-At: The problem does not appear with `emacs -Q', though, that correctly sees version 0.9.3. What could be going wrong?