From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: kobarity Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#71170: 30.0.50; hs-hide-all in python mode not works as expected Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2024 00:22:19 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87a5kfsiuw.fsf@gmail.com> <86fru6yyly.fsf@gnu.org> <87wmnh6vbs.fsf@gmail.com> <87fru512ne.fsf@gmail.com> <87y17xrm5p.fsf@gmail.com> <86plsrd4za.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19370"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?Q?Goj=C5=8D?=) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/30.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Cc: lorniu@gmail.com, 71170@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 08 17:25:01 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sFxwD-0004oP-6e for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 08 Jun 2024 17:25:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sFxvz-0005vU-Nt; Sat, 08 Jun 2024 11:24:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sFxvy-0005vI-Kr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jun 2024 11:24:46 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sFxvy-0007Tc-8o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jun 2024 11:24:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sFxwD-0000lq-Pj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jun 2024 11:25:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: kobarity Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2024 15:25:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 71170 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 71170-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B71170.17178602472885 (code B ref 71170); Sat, 08 Jun 2024 15:25:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 71170) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jun 2024 15:24:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39219 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sFxvL-0000kT-0a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jun 2024 11:24:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf1-f182.google.com ([209.85.210.182]:46361) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sFxvF-0000jt-Cq for 71170@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jun 2024 11:24:06 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf1-f182.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-7041082a80aso1259783b3a.1 for <71170@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 08 Jun 2024 08:23:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1717860159; x=1718464959; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from :message-id:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=dutsfzPklcOSALdhtY4jGv2B8NivTLPbFotEVdVcdbc=; b=P/sDouACXqPnjb4+mp1ZfScrgUnT0+e17DvoDzac0Pk0RU/IFfNEDRRfKlJFcRhOAm U1ID9rvMxXl3FOZqJ/yF1uWDD2aXW5Ss8arXnmIXxVvc4fayExdQ23n1aAFJncYVm/AV ZRxwo4Z6OTn7U52slPy5c4LSxZQE0O6qdp9cZuBX5I2ImrXm63iRWBaQBLvvVgXcwT// VVkZnBDe0runJApV+ZpssUQGHmZ7G+UjO/SES/VTmh7eLKpAzl/Mw/JP8uYMYNaxt/V8 a4Nzgpm3Ktuik+W9rzBkZs1KkO7yktxJvC4AHYHo06Q4P9lcd+xt5kf3C4/iX67Ugyqv 9gXw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1717860159; x=1718464959; h=mime-version:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from :message-id:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=dutsfzPklcOSALdhtY4jGv2B8NivTLPbFotEVdVcdbc=; b=wue8OUKLMK+cbR4Va+dfGrDuNPzONVak2ysz5upUt0vzTVWQoTECbODQ6XIxPUeCMU 9VpBnJ64kf9y59P/HEwOI2LTOcXSoLDVhrYlTkrpy1QabCeDsZEJe9i/xj7s2PlYoPVN EScoftQLWphaZU43qhdQRKj8haioD8cMFAaqe02/UZtym9geyi1eOB3kfhAqyrB4D/Fx Yh0A/s6XihILU/zCtzW9YoA2ut1ywhCiG0nSEql18MiJ14N+v/kY8nLVQKfwPam1f3Sh GqmijlGhp+4STldmHDY7RaoktRxE3R6iYOd/AdZ7HW5zB5/OU50S9vLJafu7Rx7zx47h U5ow== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXQdgy77GSCcezhQd0tho0k7LhpClMXm6kMxt49w7Rii39jtoQXYkszLkbGXBpIaBd0inob84booLPmxMxIgZl1XHCgf6E= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy3EaKwd5Aee8Zat0np0IsSKeoYCXZ6nGLvwBbdC9T9x0ASQCAI oLx80rnx1i40Zz47CDPaHngALpCqY6/ah8Gs3TDUyF8NMp2tHdA5 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFEOkzcut9DWiAZvuFiSGDMOj8Brlxxd+f29RS2r3enRge3t6u11JMmayVxw8yDiq0RnUhWIg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:7288:b0:1b5:d00e:98da with SMTP id adf61e73a8af0-1b5d00e9b1cmr901327637.23.1717860159261; Sat, 08 Jun 2024 08:22:39 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (58x12x133x161.ap58.ftth.ucom.ne.jp. [58.12.133.161]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-703fd498c4csm4245293b3a.138.2024.06.08.08.22.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 08 Jun 2024 08:22:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86plsrd4za.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:286860 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Ping! Can we please make progress with this bug report? > > > Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 18:05:48 +0900 > > From: kobarity > > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , > > 71170@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > lorniu wrote: > > > > > > > > > I came here mainly to report the bug. My patch is just a suggestion. You > > > can decide what to do with it. Thanks. > > > > > > -- > > > Mess. > > > > Understood. Then I think it would be better to separate the proposed > > improvements to combine blank lines from the bug. > > > > Does anyone want the ability to combine blank lines when hiding blocks? I propose to apply my bug fix patch of May 25. So far, no one seems to want the new feature, but if they do, they can report the bug separately.