From: kobarity <kobarity@gmail.com>
To: Liu Hui <liuhui1610@gmail.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, 68559@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#68559: [PATCH] Improve Python shell completion
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2024 22:22:11 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eke75xzd7fuk.wl-kobarity@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQTW-NW+f3PreaT5rKv39c3EOOw1asu=cuqd2tPXKxYsOYgaw@mail.gmail.com>
Liu Hui wrote:
> kobarity <kobarity@gmail.com> 于2024年1月25日周四 23:38写道:
> > 1. Module names cannot be completed in Python buffer.
> Can you elaborate? The completion of module names never worked for me
> except using IPython with non-native completion mechanism.
>
> Because module names cannot be completed using vanilla python
> interpreter in the terminal, they are also not completed even with the
> patch, unless jedi is available.
Hmm, I must have done something wrong. I cannot reproduce the problem
of module name completion even with the previous patch.
As for the current python-mode, I was able to complete the module
names because I enabled Jedi in PYTHONSTARTUP. Sorry for the confusion.
I'm experiencing strange behavior regarding completion of import
statement in a block in Python buffer. If I try to type the following
lines and then try to complete it, it will fail.
#+begin_src python
try:
im
#+end_src
However, when I try to complete at the beginning of the second line:
#+begin_src python
try:
#+end_src
"import" keyword also appears as a candidate. If I cancel the
candidates and type "im" and try to complete it, it will succeed.
This behavior does not occur in Python Shell buffer.
Another thing I noticed is the multi-line import statement. If the
import statement is one-line, each items (IGNORECASE and MULTILINE in
the example below) can be completed.
#+begin_src python
from re import IGNORECASE, MULTILINE
#+end_src
However, they cannot be completed if the import statement spans
multi-line.
#+begin_src python
from re import (
IGN
#+end_src
This happens in both Python buffer and Python Shell buffer. Perhaps
this is a limitation of Jedi completer?
> > 2. Completion is not working in comments.
> >
> > I'm not sure if the completion should work in comments, but some
> > people might want it because the current python-mode allows it in both
> > Python buffer and Python Shell buffer.
>
> Thanks for pointing it out. The attached patch should now restore
> previous basic completion behavior in comments.
Thanks, I confirmed that basic completion (without keyword argument
completion) can be performed within comments.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-28 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-18 4:48 bug#68559: [PATCH] Improve Python shell completion Liu Hui
2024-01-18 6:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-01-21 9:34 ` kobarity
2024-01-23 11:31 ` Liu Hui
2024-01-23 14:15 ` kobarity
2024-01-24 10:07 ` Liu Hui
2024-01-25 15:38 ` kobarity
2024-01-26 10:12 ` Liu Hui
2024-01-28 13:22 ` kobarity [this message]
2024-01-29 13:15 ` kobarity
2024-02-01 9:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-02-01 14:39 ` kobarity
2024-02-01 15:02 ` Liu Hui
2024-02-04 12:09 ` Liu Hui
2024-02-04 14:35 ` kobarity
2024-02-05 15:03 ` Liu Hui
2024-02-06 1:25 ` Liu Hui
2024-02-06 15:12 ` kobarity
2024-02-07 13:22 ` Liu Hui
2024-02-07 15:19 ` kobarity
2024-02-08 12:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-02-08 13:33 ` Liu Hui
2024-02-08 13:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-02-08 14:16 ` Liu Hui
2024-02-08 16:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-02-15 14:43 ` Mattias Engdegård
2024-02-15 16:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-02-15 16:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-02-15 17:21 ` Mattias Engdegård
2024-02-19 13:18 ` Basil L. Contovounesios
2024-02-20 4:46 ` Liu Hui
2024-02-20 13:15 ` Basil L. Contovounesios
2024-02-21 10:00 ` Liu Hui
2024-02-21 14:55 ` Basil L. Contovounesios
2024-02-22 10:31 ` Liu Hui
2024-02-22 13:56 ` Basil L. Contovounesios
2024-02-23 13:07 ` Liu Hui
2024-02-28 14:47 ` Basil L. Contovounesios
2024-02-16 4:06 ` Liu Hui
2024-02-16 7:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-02-16 12:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-02-16 3:24 ` Liu Hui
2024-02-16 9:34 ` kobarity
2024-02-16 11:45 ` Mattias Engdegård
2024-02-16 15:24 ` kobarity
2024-02-16 15:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-02-16 20:10 ` Mattias Engdegård
2024-02-17 13:33 ` kobarity
2024-02-20 10:16 ` Mattias Engdegård
2024-02-21 13:13 ` kobarity
2024-02-21 18:20 ` Mattias Engdegård
2024-02-22 16:15 ` kobarity
2024-02-23 11:00 ` Mattias Engdegård
2024-02-23 14:39 ` kobarity
2024-02-26 11:06 ` Liu Hui
2024-02-26 12:16 ` Mattias Engdegård
2024-02-26 15:08 ` kobarity
2024-02-28 14:49 ` Basil L. Contovounesios
2024-03-06 10:14 ` Liu Hui
2024-03-08 15:44 ` Basil L. Contovounesios
2024-03-11 11:35 ` Liu Hui
2024-03-11 16:02 ` Basil L. Contovounesios
2024-03-13 10:21 ` Liu Hui
2024-03-14 14:24 ` Basil L. Contovounesios
2024-03-16 6:49 ` Liu Hui
2024-03-16 8:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-02-17 4:36 ` Liu Hui
2024-02-17 13:20 ` Mattias Engdegård
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eke75xzd7fuk.wl-kobarity@gmail.com \
--to=kobarity@gmail.com \
--cc=68559@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=liuhui1610@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.