From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8857: display-buffer attempt to pop-up frame in batch mode causes "Unknown terminal type" error Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:23:46 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1308004070 13461 80.91.229.12 (13 Jun 2011 22:27:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:27:50 +0000 (UTC) To: 8857@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 14 00:27:47 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QWFbm-0006II-6f for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:27:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45195 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWFbl-000526-88 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:27:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57829) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWFYF-0004Kr-PB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:24:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWFYA-0002fT-JQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:24:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53551) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWFYA-0002fK-9L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:24:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QWFYA-0006Oe-27; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:24:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8857 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8857-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8857.130800383724575 (code B ref 8857); Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:24:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8857) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jun 2011 22:23:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QWFY5-0006OK-26 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:23:57 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QWFXz-0006O3-VC for 8857@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:23:56 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43227) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWFXu-00034q-Au; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:23:46 -0400 X-Spook: UMTS New World Order anthrax terrorism Bellcore X-Ran: A^A<4tSeHP2i;q3(f]Kr03-s49pJ0g=uU,MagAlJYGeV.9-NadYm;7D*DHC!=zG-$:9~7[ X-Hue: red X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:21:30 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:24:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:47114 Archived-At: PS I forgot to say that I think display-buffer should not try to pop-up frames (or do anything at all?) in batch-mode. Or if it must give an error it should try to give a more helpful one than "Unknown terminal type".